[SIESTA-L] How to use COOP tool in siesta-3.0-b

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear siesta users: Who can give me some instructions on how to use COOP analysis. Can I use COOP to get PDOS over all the atoms in the system,and can I plot the result in the real space with the system structure. And in LocalDensityOfStates block,one can specify the enery rang.Can COOP do like th

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico yoshi
Ok Zhang, You used the TS.UpdateDMCROnly in the structure with some electrode layers in scat? If yes, I think this helped the convergence. If not, i don't know what happen. When I used this Ts option, the convergence was bad too(without the inclusion of elec layers). But i didn't test TS.UpdateDMC

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Kemal Bagci
Hello, Did any of you ever encounter a problem with the XML files? I am trying to reach the core of the problem and so far all fingers point at the Fox subroutines that deal with XML files. Any comments? Cheers, Kemal

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear yoshi, TS.UpdateDMCROnly helps me solve this problem.I have 3 layers for each electrodes in the scattering region,and this is just a repeat unit of Au(111),and there is also a 3-atom layer between the molecular and the electrodes part in scattering region. Usually,the screening length is ab

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Thanks again. 2010-05-11 Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-11 00:31 主 题: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi again, Once time, i tried to change this values, but without results at convergence. My Solution was increase t

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico yoshi
Hi again, Once time, i tried to change this values, but without results at convergence. My Solution was increase the scat region with electrode layers. The convergence is better with SZ and SZP basis. You can try use this if your system is described well with this basis. The polarization of spin a

Re: [SIESTA-L] Denchar showed wrong result., Why?

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Alexander Vozny
Hi guys, the analysis of H2O is meant to be wrong with SIESTA since it uses pseudopotentials and it will never produce the peak of charge on H. In most of other cases it will work fine even with RHO (without any core corrections). If you really need to deal with H (or other atoms without charg

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear yoshi, OccupationFunction MP can not solve my probelm. I am not sure how to decide the TS values for a certain system. TS.ComplexContour.NLine,TS.ComplexContour.NCircle , TS.biasContour.NumPoints ,TS.ComplexContour.NPoles,as I know the max value of TS.ComplexContour.NLine is 11, the default

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear yoshi, I think in FD ,the electron temperature correspond to the system temperature,but in MP the temperature is just a trick for convergence. Maybe MP may help me .I usually use the defult one. And as you say, TS.UpdateDMCROnly maybe can help me ,if so ,it suggests I have not include enough