Re: [SIESTA-L] Fwd: Transiesta error in electrode size

2016-12-05 Por tôpico anita dameh
Yes, I got the same warning with Siesta 4.0 and 4.1. b.1 but there is no such warning with siesta 3.2. Regrades, Anita On 4 December 2016 at 02:24, berna uyanık wrote: > Could you try with siesta 4.0? > > 2016-12-03 12:01 GMT+02:00 anita dameh : > >> >> -- Forwarded message --

Re: [SIESTA-L] Fwd: Transiesta error in electrode size

2016-12-05 Por tôpico berna uyanık
Dear Anita, Is your question about "transiesta error in electrode size" or about zGNR zGNR is suitable for device electronics because of its semiconductor properties. There are articles in scholar.google.com for zGNR devices. Regards. 2016-12-05 1:34 GMT+02:00 berna uyanık : > http://docs.quantu

Re: [SIESTA-L] Fwd: Transiesta error in electrode size

2016-12-05 Por tôpico berna uyanık
Tbtrans has been using netcdf4 since siesta4.1. There are changes in fdf files. But, I had same error which was fixed by "TS.NumUsedAtomsRight/Left " in siesta4.0. For transport calculations you can also try abinit and wanT together. And compere results. Bests. 2016-12-04 0:54 GMT+02:00 berna uyan

Re: [SIESTA-L] Fwd: Transiesta error in electrode size

2016-12-05 Por tôpico berna uyanık
http://docs.quantumwise.com/tutorials/intro_vnl_atk3/intro_vnl_atk3.html There is a little information in quantumwise.com. But I think, you should write maunally lengths of electrodes for zGNR. In my opinion, you can create zGNR nanodevices. 2016-12-05 1:12 GMT+02:00 berna uyanık : > Tbtrans has

Re: [SIESTA-L] Fwd: Transiesta error in electrode size

2016-12-05 Por tôpico Nick Papior
The new transiesta version introduces many more checks regarding the setup of the transiesta calculation. Indeed if the latest transiesta calculation states that the electrodes is too short, then essentially the electrode self-energy cannot be correctly calculated (i.e. the physics is wrong). One r