Re: [SIESTA-L] different electrodes and cell boundaries in transiesta calculation

2011-11-27 Por tôpico Yun-Peng Wang
The partition of two-probe system into left+scat+right rely on good screening of electrodes. If silicon is used as electrode, you should include huge number of layer into the scattering region. Actually, I think transiesta is not the best choice for your problem. best, Yun-Peng On 11/27/2011

Re: [SIESTA-L] different electrodes and cell boundaries in transiesta calculation

2011-11-27 Por tôpico Roberto Guerra
Hi Peng, thanks for the answer. Actually I'm using silicon for the electrodes, that may not that efficient in screening like metals. I've verified that I get different AVTRANS plots when I change the cell side along z, or when I passivate the electrodes with hydrogens, or when I use a periodic

Re: [SIESTA-L] different electrodes and cell boundaries in transiesta calculation

2011-11-23 Por tôpico Yun-Peng Wang
In my opinion, the purpose of left+scat+right structure is to build a starting charge density for transiesta run, especially charge density in the scattering region. Due to good screening property of metals or other conducting electrodes, the dangling bonds at ends of left+scat+right structure

[SIESTA-L] different electrodes and cell boundaries in transiesta calculation

2011-11-23 Por tôpico Roberto Guerra
Hello, I cannot figure out what's the correct way of setting up the scattering region in the case of electrodes made by different materials. After I do the calculation for the left and right electrodes, I build the system with left+scat+right regions. The problem is that in defining the cell