Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico yoshi
> > Guangping Zhang > > > > 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br > 发送时间: 2010-05-11 00:31 > 主 题: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence > 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es > > > > Hi again, > > Once time, i tried to change this values

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Kemal Bagci
Hello, Did any of you ever encounter a problem with the XML files? I am trying to reach the core of the problem and so far all fingers point at the Fox subroutines that deal with XML files. Any comments? Cheers, Kemal

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi again, Once time, i tried to change this values, but without results at convergence. My Solution was increase the scat region with electrode layers. The convergence is better with SZ and SZP basis. You can try use

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Thanks again. 2010-05-11 Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-11 00:31 主 题: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi again, Once time, i tried to change this values, but without results at convergence. My Solution was increase

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico yoshi
> > > > 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br > 发送时间: 2010-05-10 11:16 > 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence > 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es > > > > > Hi, > I don't understand in details the variable OccupationFunction too, but >

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-10 11:16 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi, I don't understand in details the variable OccupationFunction too, but there is reference in the manual. In page 55 of pdf siesta-

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-10 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
enought number of electrode layers. Thanks for your exchanging. 2010-05-10 Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-10 11:16 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi, I don't understand in details the variable OccupationFunction too

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear yoshi, Thank you very much! 2010-05-10 Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-10 11:16 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hi, I don't understand in details the variable OccupationFunction too, but there is referen

Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico yoshi
4. It is not enought? Thanks ! 2010-05-09 Guangping Zhang 发件人: yo...@df.ufscar.br 发送时间: 2010-05-09 21:42 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es About this problem, You can include more electrode structures in scattering region. This should increase

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear Kemal Bagci, I think my installation is OK. So I think this is not the case as yours.For I can calculation others normally. Thanks. 2010-05-10 Guangping Zhang 发件人: Kemal Bagci 发送时间: 2010-05-10 00:08 主 题: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Kemal Bagci
Well, in my case, the problem happened when I was running a sample given to me by a friend. He has successfully ran and completed the execution, without any problems of neither reading the file nor convergence. Thus I was assuming it was a problem of my installation or something else. Any clues?

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
21:42 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es About this problem, You can include more electrode structures in scattering region. This should increase the convergence. There are two way to perform scf: OccupationFunction MP or the default

Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico yoshi
About this problem, You can include more electrode structures in scattering region. This should increase the convergence. There are two way to perform scf: OccupationFunction MP or the default OccupationFunction FD if you use the MP, you can use high temperatures, like 600-700. But bewa

Re: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear Kemal Bagci, This is the first time a encountered.I have a serial of systems which have a little difference.And the other systems are OK,but this system only. Thanks. 2010-05-09 Guangping Zhang 发件人: Kemal Bagci 发送时间: 2010-05-09 20:43 主 题: Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
. By the way, the electrode and the scatterin region calculation must use a same tempereture for electron smearing ? Thanks again. 2010-05-09 Guangping Zhang 发件人: Mehmet Topsakal 发送时间: 2010-05-09 18:44 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es If you

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Kemal Bagci
Dear Guanping Zhang, Let me get it straight. Are you saying that you get this error sometimes and not all the time? I have not made many trials myself, so it might as well be the case. Could you please check, when you get the error, do you also get an error saying 'the TSDM in file doesn't match'

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear bjnagare, I use 300K for electron smearing,and I try MixWeight from 0.25 to 0.02,it is no use. Thanks for your attention. 2010-05-09 Guangping Zhang 发件人: bjnagare 发送时间: 2010-05-09 18:48 主 题: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Dear sir

Re: Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence 收件人: siesta-l@uam.es Hello everyone, I have encountered the same problem. My convergence numbers were much worse though. I believed that the problem had to do with reading the .TSHS file obtained from the electrode run, but I think it is deeper

Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico bjnagare
Dear sir, Before checking the convergence with increasing temperature, check it with reducing mixing parameter. Thanks On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Mehmet Topsakal < topsa...@unam.bilkent.edu.tr> wrote: > If you are using DZP, you may need to increase the tempereture to 600-700 > K. SZP usua

Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Mehmet Topsakal
If you are using DZP, you may need to increase the tempereture to 600-700 K. SZP usually converges at 300K. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Kemal Bagci wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have encountered the same problem. My convergence numbers were much worse > though. > > I believed that the pro

Re: [SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Kemal Bagci
Hello everyone, I have encountered the same problem. My convergence numbers were much worse though. I believed that the problem had to do with reading the .TSHS file obtained from the electrode run, but I think it is deeper then that. If anyone had encountered a similar problem, let's exchange i

[SIESTA-L] why transiesta can not get convergence

2010-05-09 Por tôpico Guangping Zhang
Dear transiesta users: I have encountered a subtle convergence problem, even I use DM.MixingWeight 0.02 ,DM.NumberPulay 5.the siesta calculation can easy get convergence after 40 SCFs.But the transiesta *.TSDE .. The SCFs like following transiesta: TSiscf Eharris(eV) E_KS(eV) Free