hould have access to some addresses from APNIC, then I believe
a more developed form of this proposal would be required.
Regards,
David Woodgate
On 4/02/2015 4:56 AM, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
Dear SIG members
The proposal "prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria"
of the scope of APNIC's business.
Regards,
David Woodgate
On 1/03/2015 11:30 PM, Ajay Kumar wrote:
Personally,I don't see any benefit,which community may be getting
after accepting this proposal. I don't support this proposal.
Regards,
Ajai Kumar
On 24 February 2015 at 22:
volous requests.
- Or a cap could be imposed on the number of AS numbers allocated per
account;
- Or a combination of cap and charging; for example, up to xx ASs per
account are free, and then each additional AS will be charged at $yy per
AS per year.
- Existing constraints should remain fo
