Hello Dean,
We are not aware of any potential members who may have decided not to
apply for IPv4 addresses or AS numbers based on how they have
interpreted the policy wording.
However, we explain the policy criteria to any potential members who do
contact APNIC, and those who are not multiho
Hi Owen,
On 15/09/2015 3:36 am, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Sep 14, 2015, at 01:59 , Masato Yamanishi mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
In Jakarta, Geoff Huston presented the status of our IPv4 resources,
in particular about exhaustion and transfer,
and some participants asked t
p://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> ; Keybase:
https://keybase.io/skeeve
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:07 AM, George Kuo mailto:geo...@apnic.net>> wrote:
Hi Owen,
On 15/09/2015 3:3
Hi Mike,
On 7/09/2016 8:09 AM, Mike Jager wrote:
This proposal does not prohibit transfers due to M&A. Transfers of 103/8
block due to M&A continues to be allowed, based on the M&A transfer
procedures.
I had always assumed that anyone trying to get more than one allocation of 103/8
was cre
Hi Aftab,
For 2017, the secretariat has processed 158 market transfers as of 15
August. So, this is roughly about 5 transfer requests a week.
On average, it takes about 4-5 responses from APNIC hostmasters to
complete a transfer request. We have a procedure to respond to a
correspondence withi
IC policy.
George
On 18/8/17 6:48 pm, George Kuo wrote:
Hi Aftab,
For 2017, the secretariat has processed 158 market transfers as of 15
August. So, this is roughly about 5 transfer requests a week.
On average, it takes about 4-5 responses from APNIC hostmasters to
complete a transfer request.
Hi Skeeve and all,
Ahead of the upcoming policy SIG, I'd like to share more info about how
APNIC secretariat evaluates M & A requests. As part of our due diligence
check, we have the procedure to verify the
authenticity of the M & A request documentations received. Circumstances
where it's obv
