Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-04-10 Thread Sanjaya Sanjaya
Dear all, I'd like to conclude the issue surrounding the testing of CONFER at the last policy SIG meeting in Ho Chi Minh City, that caused a complaint to be raised at the AGM and on this mailing list, particularly in relation to the discussion on prop-118. APNIC has reviewed the CONFER server

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-06 Thread Masato Yamanishi
Hi All, Even though I'm out-going Chair, let me raise a couple of important points since it seems many Community members forgot or are ignoring them as too heated-up now. Firstly, Our Policy Development Process is based on "Consensus", NOT "Voting" as clearly described in APNIC corporate document

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-02 Thread Randy Bush
> I hope that we can get to the bottom of this seems to me it hit the bottom some messages back. time to pretend we work for a living. randy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * ___ sig-policy mailing list sig

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-02 Thread David Hilario
Hi Craig, Thank you for the reply. > Yesterday during the Policy SIG session, it became quite apparent to everyone in the room that the CONFER system was >indicating community sentiments that were significantly at odds with the sentiments and discussions taking place within >the room. > >Th

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-02 Thread Ernest Tse
Dear all, Just want the clarify that, my company is support this policy. Is it still keep discuss at the next meeting or what ? And also, will APNIC to develop a better online vote system in the next meeting for voting this policy ? Best Regards, Ernest TsePacswitch Globe Telecom Ltd.// Web: h

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-02 Thread Lu Heng
Dear Community: Craig’s email opens as a community email addressing “Colleagues”, but later on the tone changes as he is not referring to me but addressing me by changing to “you” and “your organisation” Logic of the whole event was, APNIC staff’s comment during prop-118 could be misunderstoo

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-01 Thread Craig Ng
Colleagues Yesterday during the Policy SIG session, it became quite apparent to everyone in the room that the CONFER system was indicating community sentiments that were significantly at odds with the sentiments and discussions taking place within the room. This discrepancy appeared wit

Re: [sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-01 Thread Ernest Tse
Dear David, I strongly support this policy, so how`s this policy going on ? Anyone can tell me ? Best Regards, Ernest TsePacswitch Globe Telecom Ltd.// Web: http://www.pacswitch.com// Tel: +852-21570550//Mobile: +852-62536678//Skype: codesixs On Wed, 01/03/2017 18.50, Lu Heng wrote: >

[sig-policy] CONFER--as what happened today in policy discussion.

2017-03-01 Thread Lu Heng
Dear Community, I am sending this letter at the best wishes for future stable growth and peaceful discussion. My colleague David proposed the policy No Need in APNIC region. The discussion went fairly well, until a point when Adam rose up and declared that the CONFER system was being gamed, he wa