s)? We like it or not, this is a lost battle in my
opinion. You can't say, transfer IPv4, renumber your ASN and IPv6!
Regards,
Hiroki
---
Hiroki Kawabata
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
Subject: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modificatio
.
About inter-RIR, there are not consensus about (M and/or market)transfer IPv6
address
between RIRs. First of all, we think we need to discuss about it.
Regards,
Hiroki
---
Hiroki Kawabata
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
Subject: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-130, based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons
that
Dear Jordi,
May we have some discussion about the proposed policy? Could you please
respond?
regards,
Sumon
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 8:20 PM Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> If I may ask the author.
>
> - Explain the problem statement.
> - Can you provide an example where this "unclear policy of M"
Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of
transfer policies
If I may ask the author.
- Explain the problem statement.
- Can you provide an example where this "unclear policy of M" created a
problem?
- Did you ask Secretariat if this is actually a problem? Did they provide any
stats?
If I may ask the author.
- Explain the problem statement.
- Can you provide an example where this "unclear policy of M" created a
problem?
- Did you ask Secretariat if this is actually a problem? Did they provide
any stats?
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:59 PM Sumon
Dear SIG members,
The proposal "prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 September 2019.
We invite you to review and comment on the proposal
