cy/proposals/prop-132
>
> Regards
>
> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
>
> --
>
> prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons
>
> -
pose and documentation of this intent should be done through the
>>>>> IETF and be documented in an STD or RFC.
>>>>>
>>>>> I support the idea, but I believe the proper place to start is the
>>>>> IETF.
>>>>>
>>>>>
documented in an STD or RFC.
>>>>>
>>>>> I support the idea, but I believe the proper place to start is the IETF.
>>>>>
>>>>> Owen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 9, 2019, at 3:01 AM, Sumon Ahmed Sabir
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear SIG members,
>>>>
>>>> The proposal "prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons" has been sent to
>>>> the Policy SIG for review.
>>>>
>>&g
; <mailto:sasa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear SIG members,
>>>>>
>>>>> The proposal "prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons" has been sent to
>>>>> the
Hi Andrew,
Good suggestion, it makes more sense and very well noted. I will made the
change accordingly. Let me see if any other suggestions comes out later
today otherwise I will update the policy.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Dul wrote:
> Hello!
> On
comment on the proposal on the mailing list
>>> before the meeting.
>>>
>>> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
>>> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
Hello!
On 8/15/2019 5:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by
IANA rather than by an RIR from what you quoted.
Yes, for resources
Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather
>> than by an RIR from what you quoted.
>>
>
> Yes, for resources not allocated by IANA or marked as Reserved But IANA
> has nothing to do with resources
roposal to make it more
effective?
Information about this proposal is available at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132
Regards
Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
--------------
roblem you are experiencing? If so,
>> tell the community about your situation.
>> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>>
ou see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>> effective?
>>
>> Information about this proposal is available at:
>> http://www.apnic.net/pol
al?
>> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>> effective?
>>
>> Information about this proposal is available at:
>> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132
>>
>> Regards
&
?
> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
> effective?
>
> Information about this proposal is available at:
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132
>
> Regards
>
> Sumon, B
ttp://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132>
>
> Regards
>
> Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
>
>
> --
>
> prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons
>
> ---
e at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132
Regards
Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
------
prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons
--
Propo
16 matches
Mail list logo
