Re: [Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Doc
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Doug McLaren wrote: > > RMS has done some great things for software -- don't get me wrong. > But he's got more than his share of kookness going on too. Dude! After 3-or-so years, we've finally agreed on something! Doc ___

Re: [Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Jean-Philippe Martin
All, I am using UT as my ISP, but I have recently been spammed by RoadRunner on my private email account. So I will avoid them in the future because I think that, as an ISP, they should know better. Of course, everyone can make their own decisions from there. Cheers, Jean-Philippe ___

Re: [Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Eric Irrgang
My household signed on to Telocity last summer. Their gateway modem is really cool and amazingly smart. It has an elaborate self-test with comprehensive diagnostics and a good built-in web server/interface. It even places a telephone call to their tech support line if it has problems it can't d

Re: [Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Daniel Brown
i use RR and am satisfied with the service. recently, ive had pleasant experiences with the billing dept (aside from the sending them money thing) but learned quickly to not call their tech support. if you have Qs about network status, ask them *specifically* what you want to know. but even th

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Weston Sewell
I responded to Jeffrey, but I'd like to know what other people think/have experienced (as I'm sure Jeffrey would too). I've had DirectTV DSL (used to be Telocity) for about 5 months now. You get a static IP, no hassle about using *nix (even a *nix section in the install manual), and you can run

Re: [Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Doug McLaren
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:31:14PM -0600, Joseph Reisinger wrote: | > So, after all the arguing and mumbojumbo, I have a question, what | > is RMS and why did it prompt a name change? Seems to be some sort | > of philosophical schism in the Linux community. | | RMS is a who, not a what. Richard

Re: [Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Eric Irrgang
Hmm... I suppose one could consider Richard M. Stallman (RMS) a one-man schism... On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ricardo Lopez wrote: >So, after all the arguing and mumbojumbo, I have a question, what is RMS >and why did it prompt a name change? Seems to be some sort of >philosophical schism in the Linux

Re: [Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread James D. Wright
I say this every time someone asks. This is a warning not a recommendation... SWBell DSL has *the worst* customer service in the history of mankind. The only reason I keep them is I'm locked in at $40/month with no PPoE. Their DNS or DHCP server usually goes down for about 6-12 hours once ever

Re: [Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Joseph Reisinger
> So, after all the arguing and mumbojumbo, I have a question, what is RMS > and why did it prompt a name change? Seems to be some sort of > philosophical schism in the Linux community. RMS is a who, not a what. Richard M. Stallman. You can check out www.stallman.org . He likes butterflies. And

Re: [Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Ricardo Lopez
So, after all the arguing and mumbojumbo, I have a question, what is RMS and why did it prompt a name change? Seems to be some sort of philosophical schism in the Linux community. Alfonso ___ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.utacm.

[Siglinux] SIGLinux to SigFree to SIGLinux once again

2002-03-19 Thread Jeff Strunk
Hello again, I apologize for my haste in changing the name. Nameshare is very important. We are now SIGLinux: The UT ACM's GNU/Linux Users Group.(See announcement below) On to an announcement: Another informal meeting. Thursday March 28, 8:00pm at Mojo's. We will discuss our upcomi

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Jason Smith
Said Doc on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:57:48AM -0600, > RoadRunner is the single most aggravating provider of ANYTHING I've > ever dealt with. They act stupid, they ARE stupid, they lie, they > violate their own contracts, and gods dammit, they are the best in > Austin. Well-put. I hate that god

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] soapbox

2002-03-19 Thread Jason Smith
Said Doc on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:45:00AM -0600, > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Victor Pelt wrote: > > > i think's that's called an 'executive privilage' or something like that > > > > just out of curriosity. what excactly makes a linux box a GNU linux box. is it > > something like having gnome install

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread Jason Pepas
roadrunner blocks port 80. however, 265 KB/sec to joe2.ma.utexas.edu/debian is rather nice... -jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tuesday 19 March 2002 10:45am, Jeffrey Forman wrote: > I'm in the search for a high-speed ISP in Austin for the summer > 2002-spring 2003, but don't know which one makes th

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread michael stone
I agree with Doc in that TW basically still sucks, but are the best in town so far. Below is a message I sent out last year regarding this same thread. We were talking about jump.net DSL also, but I think it was stated that they don't do residential service anymore (I am not sure if they are eve

[Siglinux] Re: [Sigfree] Austin ISP's

2002-03-19 Thread michael stone
I agree with Doc in that TW basically still sucks, but are the best in town so far. Below is a message I sent out last year regarding this same thread. We were talking about jump.net DSL also, but I think it was stated that they don't do residential service anymore (I am not sure if they are eve