Re: [Siglinux] GNU GPL woes

2003-06-29 Thread Andrew Gaul
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 12:52:23PM -0500, Shashank G. Khandelwal wrote: > Since Qt is GPL'd, does this require that we release our software > under the GPL? Yes. > We would like users of our programs to cite some of our published > papers. ... Am I correct in assuming that what we want to do is m

[Siglinux] Fwd: Out of Office AutoReply:

2003-06-29 Thread Victor Pelt
to the listserve, all message with Out of Office AutoReply should be blocked I will be out of the office 06.30.2003 through 07.04.2003 and will return on Monday 07.07.2003. If you need immediate assistance please contact Joyce Crocker. Thanks. - End forwarded message - _

Re: [Siglinux] GNU GPL woes

2003-06-29 Thread Victor Pelt
may library's (like Qt even though i don't know about qt itself) have the LGPL which allow the use without having your software to be GPL. as long as you don't use Qt source in your product there isn't an issue If your software is GPL it's GPL. what is possible is that if you are the owner of the

[Siglinux] GNU GPL woes

2003-06-29 Thread Shashank G. Khandelwal
Hi all, I've read through quite a bit of documentation, and before I start making recommendations at work, I'd like to clarify a few things. Hopefully there are people on this mailing list that are well versed with the terms of the GNU GPL. I work for a research group at UT and we want to relea