On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 01:00:50AM -0500, jeff strunk wrote:
> The ACM meetings are not meant to be anything for SIGLinux at all. I
> like the idea of a monthly(or more often) meeting. The time a few of us
> went to Spiderhouse was lots of fun. Mojo's is also a good place. I
> don't know about Spid
I think those topics would be great.
One of the biggest problems I've seen is the "what's next" after the
install. We could start a series on Linux for the desktop&development
the week after an installfest. The first one could be a quick
orientation to KDE/Gnome and basic programs to do many
We typically did 1 large meeting each month. The last 2 semesters,
they were our security workshop series. We also have a weekly meeting
to keep everyone up to date, let people get involved in the projects
(Honeynet, CTF, VoIP, IPv6), and usually a quick little informative
lecture. Short lec
I'd certainly try to make it when I'm in town. We might also consider
hosting a seminar series, perhaps only one per year or semester
initially. It would be great to bring in someone like Bruce Parens.
Tim
PS. I switched nascent UTLUG email list to a biosci-linux list; any
interested biosci folks
The ACM meetings are not meant to be anything for SIGLinux at all. I
like the idea of a monthly(or more often) meeting. The time a few of us
went to Spiderhouse was lots of fun. Mojo's is also a good place. I
don't know about Spiderhouse, but Mojo's has wireless.
Then again, maybe you were thinkin
I think the best solution is to get a monthly meeting together, and
make every other one an installfest. I understand there are regular
ACM meetings, but I don't think those are generally inviting or useful
to people outside of CS. It would be good for new users to have that
group to talk to
Well, my goal by joining ULA/BOSS was to get some installfests going on
campus and I'm glad UTACM/Siglinux has taken that over ;)
As far as I know, they're no longer around. After the one active
semester nobody ever called or emailed me for help with stuff again.
There weren't any business st
Sorry, my wording wasn't very careful. My intention is not necessarily
to create a separate group, but perhaps to broaden the scope and
audience of current efforts. My impression was that siglinux is a
student organization -- which is great -- I just thought a more general
name / organizational str
while more linux is never a bad thing, is there enough intrest in having
several linux groups? (how many people do you have interest in joining utlug
that arn't in siglinux)
victor
Quoting "Timothy H. Keitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I setup a UTLUG email list at
>
> http://www.keittlab.or
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 07:48:56PM -0500, Paul Sack wrote:
> Er, isn't that what SigLinux and the splinter group, the UT Unix-Linux
> Association (is that still around), are?
Shortly after their introduction, they changed their name to B.O.S.S.
Business Operating Systems Society. They had the same
Today at 5:53pm, Timothy H. Keitt expounded:
++ I setup a UTLUG email list at
++
++ http://www.keittlab.org/mailman/listinfo/utlug
++
++ There is no UT Linux Users Group on campus at the moment. The list is
++ for anyone who is interested in starting one.
Er, isn't that what SigLinux and the
I setup a UTLUG email list at
http://www.keittlab.org/mailman/listinfo/utlug
There is no UT Linux Users Group on campus at the moment. The list is
for anyone who is interested in starting one.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Timothy H. Keitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
University of Texas at Austin
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
