Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 17:41 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> +>> {SR_MQ_EFF_VOLTAGE, 0, "effective_voltage", "Effective
> Voltage", NULL},
we just discussed this on IRC -- there is already a flag for RMS,
shouldn't this be equivalent to effective voltage/current?
Cheers,
--Daniel
-
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 04:53 -0600, djether...@varaves.com wrote:
> I attached the log file, not sure if attachements work on a mailing
> list.
The log is looking good! Samples are received and sent off to the
session bus; I can't see any errors either.
sr: [00:14.476000] session: bus: Receiv
Hi,
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 06:14 -0600, djether...@varaves.com wrote:
> I needed to extern the variable lwla1016_info that was declared in
> sysclk-lwa\protocol.h. It wasn't being initialized in api.c and had all
> null members (prior there were different instances of it per compilation
> unit sinc
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:50 +0100, Stefan Bruens wrote:
> branch fix_memory_leaks
as Uwe said, great work. Glad to see someone investigate leaks using
actual tools for the job. :)
Some minor suggestions for next time:
+ g_ptr_array_free(ctx->channellist, 1);
You can use TRUE r
Hi Magnus,
On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 21:50 +0100, Magnus Lundmark wrote:
> Here's the pulseview log from the LWLA1034 using the new lwla-hackery
> branch:
> http://pastebin.com/u6m6xnqF
Cool, thanks. This confirms it:
sr: [00:36.942358] sysclk-lwla: Partial transfer of 64 bytes, issuing new
reque
Hi,
On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 16:44 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > I now fear that this is indeed the case. Windows must be doing
> > something that hides the problem, or this issue would have turned
> > up for many users.
>
> Then run the software in a Windows kvm and look at the usbmon output.
Righ
Hi Magnus,
On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 16:46 +0100, Magnus Lundmark wrote:
> In all cases it worked flawlessly and found the LWLA1034 every time.
> I also checked sample acquisition with treiggering in Pulseview and
> this went well.
Thanks for testing, it helps a lot!
OK, could you please generate lo
Hi Magnus,
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 03:14 +0100, Magnus Lundmark wrote:
> I just got my Sysclk LWLA1034 and was looking forward to using it. I
> pullled all the sigrok code from git and it compiled without problem.
> Unfortunately I can't connect, see listing below.
[...]
if you can spare the time,
hat I can reproduce the initialization problems
100% of the time by using the hub's power button instead of hot
-plugging the device.
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 17:49 +0100, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> I still suspect it's partly due to flaky FX2 firmware on the device,
> and partly
Hi,
it's been a while -- indeed, nearly two years -- but as they say, good
things come to those who wait. :)
Support for the LWLA1016 in libsigrok's sysclk-lwla driver is finally
there and ready for testing:
https://github.com/danielkitta/libsigrok/tree/lwla1016
As of now, it is still necessary
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 17:08 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Linux has (had) lots of issues with xHCI.
That may be, but I've run into the same problem now and then on my old
desktop, which does not support USB 3 at all. On the other hand, I
can't remember the last time it failed on my current Lapt
Hi,
just noticed this mail on the list.
Magnus mailed me privately too, and it turns out that not using a USB 3
port makes it work for him. However, I still feel uneasy about that --
there may be a timing issue or something similar involved.
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 09:54 +0100, Magnus Lundmark wro
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 21:05 +0200, jry sig wrote:
> I'm getting following error messages while compiling sigrok-cli and
> pulseview:
>
> /usr/local/lib/libsigrok.so: undefined reference to `zip_discard'
> /usr/local/lib/libsigrok.so: undefined reference to `zip_file_add'
oh, that's my fault.
Hi,
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 19:40 +0100, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> I'm playing with the idea of ordering an LWLA1016 for myself, so I can
> implement support for it. Right now I'm somewhat busy though, so it may
> take a week or two before I get around to it.
after some bad luck
Hi again,
On Di, 2014-03-04 at 20:18 +, Martin Ling wrote:
> This got a lot of things working but I'm guessing is still an
> incomplete solution.
Well, but there must be a reason why it works for other drivers but not
for the LWLA1034.
I made this assumption in lwla_receive_data (protocol.c
Hi,
On Di, 2014-03-04 at 11:32 +0700, Nik Kov wrote:
> I tried run sigrok (and pulseview) on win7 with lwla1034 analyser, but
> I can't get any captured data.
as I'm not using Windows I can't test this myself. But I have opened a
bug to track the problem:
http://sigrok.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
Hi,
On Sa, 2014-01-25 at 21:55 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Sweet. Does the package also include documentation of the permission?
of course:
http://sigrok.org/gitweb/?p=sigrok-firmware.git;a=blob;f=sysclk-lwla/LICENSE.LWLA;hb=HEAD
Cheers,
--Daniel
-
Hi,
On Mi, 2014-01-22 at 23:48 +0100, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> I'm in contact now with the developer of the LWLA series, and it looks
> like the sigrok project will soon receive permission to redistribute the
> firmware.
we have indeed received permission to redistribute the LWLA
Hi another time,
On Sa, 2014-01-18 at 19:40 +0100, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> By the way, I've contacted SysClk to inquire whether they would be
> willing to allow us to redistribute their FPGA bitstreams. So far I
> haven't received any reply.
I'm in contact now with t
Hi again,
On Fr, 2014-01-17 at 01:18 +0100, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> I fear it will be somewhat tedious to exchange protocol dumps by mail
> which exercise all of the device functionality, [...]
I'm playing with the idea of ordering an LWLA1016 for myself, so I can
implement sup
Hi,
On Do, 2014-01-16 at 11:53 +0200, M.Emrah OZKAYA wrote:
> Hello, have you had any chance to look at the data I sent? Is it
> useful, do you need anything else? Thanks.
OK, I have had a look now. I have begun to document what I was able to
glean from the USB captures you and Uwe Hermann (who
Hi,
On Di, 2014-01-14 at 10:17 +0200, M.Emrah OZKAYA wrote:
> Hello, I captured my first data under Windows. I used wireshark and
> usbpcap program and the output file I'm sending (*.pcap) can be opened
> under Wireshark.
Cool, thanks for your contribution! I haven't looked at it yet, but
will d
Hi again,
On Mo, 2013-12-30 at 13:12 +0200, M.Emrah OZKAYA wrote:
> That's fantastic news, guess Santa came early this year :) Thank you
> very much.
I'm making good progress on the LWLA1034 driver, and hope to have it
ready for testing soon. However, I do not own an LWLA1016 myself. If
you wa
Hi,
On Sa, 2013-12-28 at 14:00 +0200, M.Emrah OZKAYA wrote:
> Sadly, I bought my Sysclk LWLA1016 before learning about sigrok and
> found out that it's not supported yet. (it's "planned") I know it is
> not cool to ask about ETAs for voluntary work but would you be able to
> provide some timefra
24 matches
Mail list logo
