Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:26:54AM +0100, Soeren Apel wrote:
> Since none of those are sustainable routes (we can't depend that a
> jailbreak will always be available), the software distribution itself
> is a big issue and makes this a non-starter.
Yeah, iOS support is pretty much not going t
irly easy since Apple's External Accessory
> APIs are easy for software devs to use. The UI for PulseView would
> have to be overhauled to use Apple's APIs, though.
>
> I hope that helps set expectations.
>
> -Chris
>
> From: Soeren Apel
> Sent: Saturday, No
4:01 PM
To: paulcrawfordgm; sigrok-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [sigrok-devel] Pulseview for iOS
Hello Paul,
Personally, I don't know what would be required to make PV work
on iOS and how much work that would entail. However, I assume that
there are significant differences in how
Hello Paul,
Personally, I don't know what would be required to make PV work
on iOS and how much work that would entail. However, I assume that
there are significant differences in how devices are accessed
compared to OSX, so it's probably not a straightforward matter.
If you have an idea of how t
Is there any serious consideration being given to porting Pulseview to iOS?
I am considering a new iPad Pro which now has a USB C port which should allow
the logic analyzer data to be captured but obviously I need software to see the
data.
Thanks,
Paul Crawford
___
5 matches
Mail list logo
