On 03/19/2013 06:15 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
>> The confusion stems from the fact that some
>> installed files (protocol decoders) are GPLv2+. Since those protocol
>> decoders are standalone files (not part of a binary), it's unclear
>> whether we can simply distribute the binary package (rpm) under
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:47:58PM -0500, Alex G. wrote:
> I'm trying to get libsigrokdecode into the official Fedora
> distribution[1].
Great, thanks!
> We've hit a small speed bump regarding the licensing.
>
> We know libsigrokdecode is composed of GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ sources, so the
> lib
Hi all,
I'm trying to get libsigrokdecode into the official Fedora
distribution[1]. We've hit a small speed bump regarding the licensing.
We know libsigrokdecode is composed of GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ sources, so the
library overall is GPLv3+. The confusion stems from the fact that some
installed files
3 matches
Mail list logo
