Question #702137 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
Status: Answered => Solved
Maxime PARAT confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks RaiMan, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because your team Sikuli Drivers
is
Question #702137 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
RaiMan proposed the following answer:
Until version 2.0.5 log4J 1.x exists in SikuliX through the dependency
chain tess4j -> gost4j -> log4j
Beginning with version 2.0.6 we use the latest version of Tess4J
Question #702137 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
Maxime PARAT posted a new comment:
Yes, I am asking for log4J 1.x (NOT log4j 2.x).
--
You received this question notification because your team Sikuli Drivers
is an answer contact for SikuliX.
Question #702137 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
Manfred Hampl posted a new comment:
Sorry, ignore my answer.
You are not referring to cve-2021-44228 log4j 2.x, but to the vulnerabilities
that have been reported for log4j 1.x CVE-2022-23302, -23305 or
Question #702137 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
Status: Open => Answered
Manfred Hampl proposed the following answer:
This has already been answered in other questions:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/699867
New question #702137 on SikuliX:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/702137
Hello,
My company is requesting me to analyze a potential vulnerability issue with one
of our Vendor framework based on SikuliX 2.0.
Can you please confirm there is any vulnerability with this Sikuli version
6 matches
Mail list logo
