I don't know, I haven't checked that the relevant provisions of the statutes
have not been amended, but it does seem likely.
Registered trade marks do not have a 'limited effective life' in the way that
the items listed in 995-1(1) do. Those items have a statutorily fixed maximum
term,
I have been reading more and more about AngelList and following their
blogs on pitching.
Great to know we have someone on the inside to help.
Cheers Elias!
On Oct 25, 4:04 pm, Elias Bizannes elias.bizan...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh and this might be useful to give you a better understanding of
Hoops, intangible assets like trademarks amortise rather than
depreciate. It's the same process, but you'll get more relevant info
in a search using that keyword.
If a trademark has an indefinite useful life it can't be amortised.
This would be the case most of the time.
If it has a finite life
Hey guys
Has anyone successfully achieved a CA Grant?
Does anyone know of any CA Grant advisers who run the process for
applicants?
Thanks
Nick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
Australia mailing list.
Guidelines on discussion: http://tr.im/ujKF
Hi Nick,
Companies are getting grants, although I think there is a backlog.
What state are you in, and what type of business have you got ?
Regards,
Matthew.
On Oct 26, 3:57 pm, Nick HaC nick...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys
Has anyone successfully achieved a CA Grant?
Does anyone know of
