I think an important point flew past here in the main debate: Should
governments open-source the software they develop?
I think they they should - and not only because having an open code-
base allows for public verification of the function of government (and
on the same basis as FOI laws: that p
Yes, but there's a big difference between "getting votes", and getting
enough votes to either win, or to force another party to adopt your
policies. I'd suggest that none of the three parties you name below
have had the slightest success is getting their policies enacted, so
Joseph may be well-adv
On re-reading my last post, my use of the words "venal" and
"incompetent" was probably excessive. So I retract them, and apologize
for their use.
Regards
Jason
On Jul 24, 1:03 pm, Jason_au80 wrote:
> (Apologies for this long rant - those with no interest in politi
(Apologies for this long rant - those with no interest in politics can
safely skip it.)
Mate, I'll make the assumption that you actually want to win a seat in
Parliament, and aren't just forming this political party as something
of an ego trip.
A little about my background here: Long, long ago,
I'll add a vote for anchor.net.au as well - I've been nothing but
pleased with them for Constrex.
Cheers
Jason
On Jul 15, 10:34 am, David Banes wrote:
> Sounds to me like Australian VPS providers should be rushing to
> sponsor this. :)
>
> David.
>
> On 15/07/2009, at 10:27 AM, Scott Yang wr
I had a look at your website, and my initial thought is "Why would I
use this?".
(Actually my initial thought after seeing the ASP.NET code was "Thank
god I use Ruby". But I digress).
Your website talks about features, not benefits. What is the advantage
of using a direct object store, in place
I've got a couch in Sydney (one that's quite suitable for sleeping on
too), in Erskineville. Though perhaps not for the next month or so, as
I've just moved into a new share house, so I'll take some time to get
all friendly before having people staying in the house...
Jason
On Apr 9, 7:00 am, An
