Um... if what you said here doesn't make it clear, nothing I can say
ever will.
On 25/10/12 14:18, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> Wow, how did "I am biased against women just like any other person in
> our society" turn into "in many regards it is women's fault"?
>
> S.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:
Ah sarcasm, always the fastest path to resolution of an intellectual
conversation.
Oh I see... you've confused selective statistics for practical information.
Putting numbers around something doesn't make it useful.
If you actually had a look at the numbers and applied some critical
thinking, you
On 25/10/2012, at 2:18 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> Wow, how did "I am biased against women just like any other person in
> our society" turn into "in many regards it is women's fault"?
There has been some subtle use of irony in this thread.
We should avoid jumping down anyone's throat. Even
thou
Wow, how did "I am biased against women just like any other person in
our society" turn into "in many regards it is women's fault"?
S.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Robert Shea wrote:
>
> I never said I was dodging the issue.
> I said all I can do is make my own smart choices, if I need an e
I never said I was dodging the issue.
I said all I can do is make my own smart choices, if I need an engineer,
I couldn't care less what restroom they use. Attempts at anything beyond
this are foolish.
Nor I am not ignoring the issue.
I am saying that people who perpetuate it on one side are dumb
What a relief that we're so well protected from the perils of "reverse
sexism". In my many years as a tech person I have constantly witnessed men
being treated as less than equal; ignored and rubbished by the aggressive
cabals of women that dominate our industry. It's high time someone stood up
I want to see a study on people with even vs odd numbered birthdays. As an
even birthday homo sapien, I think our inherent dominance will be clear
from the data.
All the attempts to divide the world into two groups any specific way
always seems troublesome to me - especially the ovary vs testes w
Actually, ignoring the problem doesn't help. We are by sheer nature of
our society biased towards specific groups. That goes far beyond
gender and skin color. It happens subconsciously and we are all
affected. How surprised was I to find out that I as a woman was
actually also biased against women!
"Reverse sexism" is still sexism, only more condescending.
It'd be nice if people weren't so damned stupid and insecure, but until
that day comes, we'll continue to have dumb problems with dumb attempts
at solutions. Personally, I just dodge the whole issue and just control
what I can control in
i wonder if we're all getting away in this hype cycle of reverse sexism...
there is lies, damned lies and statistics...
wondering what that article is even trying to achieve (other than audience
through sensationalism)... there's the right person for the job, and
there's the wrong person for the j
I am, but my business is not any longer my main occupation. Still
keeping in contact here though. :-)
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:51 AM, André Levy wrote:
> Women start ventures with 8% less funding than men.
>
> http://www.womenonbusiness.com/investing-in-women-infographic/?utm_sou
] Female CEOs deliver 12% higher revenues using 33% less
capital than male CEOs
Women start ventures with 8% less funding than men.
http://www.womenonbusiness.com/investing-in-women-infographic/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=investing-in-women-infographic
How ma
Women start ventures with 8% less funding than men.
http://www.womenonbusiness.com/investing-in-women-infographic/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=investing-in-women-infographic
How many of us here are women? (other than Kim Chen, obviously)
--
You received this message because you
13 matches
Mail list logo