I have a pet hate for generalizations like this - especially when they end
up having such a profound influence over important issues like financing and
angel investment.
I think every startup needs to be considered on its merits and must be based
on what you or the other founders bring to the
I like that characterisation of designer, developer and distributor (though
not exactly sure that that means). But as Phil says, it's really dependent
on the idea and what's needed.
In Silicon Valley, the matra is that you need two founders: one is too
lonely an existence and VC's don't like to
Been thinking recently about a new side project for 2011 and read a
great article on Quora about the ideal startup team. A developer, a
designer and a distributor (See:
http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-perfect-startup-team?q=perfect+startup+team)
So I thought it'd be good to shout out, and see if
