>
> I think Andrew and Mick have summed this up nicely.
>
> From my experience most, but not all, Aussie startups either lack vision
> or have vision but don't have the experience to understand how to execute
> sequentially from something small and focused to something large and
> broadly disru
Is the ambition around the financial impact or the real world impact?
It doesnt' have to be both.
We're trying to be more agressive with Pygg, Wooboard and Coachy all
aiming to be global and have a big impact. Wooboard's goal is a
trillion Woo's by 2020 - just 999,992,000 to go!
The challenge is
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eatyourowndogfood.asp
I'd side with @Andrew on this, often it is not clear initially what
may be a billion dollar idea cf million ... a lot of accidental
entrepreneurs turn out that way (eg twitter was castigated at start).
If SBers can focus on executing, then
Shane - aren't you meant to be working on Immortal Outdoors for
Startup Chile? The "let's cover the Internet with even more
commentards" idea has been kicking around since the mid 90s (I
remember a bunch of us trying to hack Netscape to do this in the
mid-90s, during grad school) and it's not getti
http://www.crashdev.com/2012/03/who-loves-you-who-fears-you.html
< quote>
If your startup idea -- implemented with quality + urgency -- doesn't
scare the pants off one or more big and dangerous incumbents, most
venture investors won't give a shit about it
< /quote>
Hard problems are characterised
On Mar 13, 12:31 pm, Geoff Langdale wrote:
> But where are the ambitious startups (or growth companies) in Sydney
> that are doing something hard and with a broad reach?
Geoff
Good to get a provocative question.
I'd like to nominate my own startup, Intresto.
Ambitious - developing the first softw
