Re: [SiliconBeach] Re: Australian IP Litigation

2011-02-19 Thread Frances Jones
Thanks for that info Jeromy, very helpful. Frances Jones http://twitter.com/FrancieJones On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jeromy Evans < jeromy.ev...@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote: > Hi, > > This page at IP Australia identifies the relevant (fragmented) > legislation: > http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au

[SiliconBeach] Re: Australian IP Litigation

2011-02-02 Thread 1_Place
Hi Ben We have a series of questions regarding the role of NDAs at: http://1place.com.au/expert/expert_wizard.php?area_id=7 Links to publicly available NDAs are available at http://www.1place.com.au/expert/expert_wizard.php?area_id=9 (including IP Australia's IP generator that you refer to). Thi

[SiliconBeach] Re: Australian IP Litigation

2011-02-01 Thread Guy Tucker
Hi Ben, I've just recently joined this group. IP lawyers are the people usually responsible for handling litigation matters (however, they may also enrol the services of a barrister). An IP lawyer is different to a Patent Attorney (I am a Patent Attorney) who provides advice on how to protect yo

[SiliconBeach] Re: Australian IP Litigation

2011-01-31 Thread Jeromy Evans
Hi, This page at IP Australia identifies the relevant (fragmented) legislation: http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/resources/legislation_index.shtml It also identifies which courts are relevant (all of them), and some of the groups that publish IP related decisions (LexisNexis and CCH). Get in their m