Re: [silk] Poking holes in FOSS..

2006-10-08 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Deepa Mohan wrote: A point of view that comes from someone whose ideas I respect (actually, Maya Venkat, mmk's sister.) [quote] The moral is obvious. You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. (Especially code from companies

Re: [silk] Poking holes in FOSS..

2006-10-08 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote [at 10:16 AM 10/9/2006] : Trust as a token of currency is based on the assumption that one is intelligent enough (another debatable point) to ascertain the difference between right and wrong Too, trust isn't binary. It can be viewed as a continuum, based on

Re: [silk] Poking holes in FOSS..

2006-10-08 Thread Srini RamaKrishnan
Udhay Shankar N wrote: Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote [at 10:16 AM 10/9/2006] : Trust as a token of currency is based on the assumption that one is intelligent enough (another debatable point) to ascertain the difference between right and wrong Too, trust isn't binary. It can be viewed as a

Re: [silk] Poking holes in FOSS..

2006-10-08 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Srini RamaKrishnan wrote [at 10:40 AM 10/9/2006] : Indeed. Do you trust the processor that runs your code to not to act against your interests? I like to think of securing a system (any system) as an exercise in rediscovering Zeno's Paradox. :) Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @