sounds like the kind of junk one would expect from an economist. With
apologies to that particular tribe.
More to the point, it was done for Bravo, "A televisual broadcaster for
the modern gentleman", target demographic: male 18-35. Let me know
when Nature runs a special insert covering "The
On Fri October 20 2006 11:22 am, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> The planespotter who had started this chain of events had no idea
> what he was doing by posting the photo online. He was just
> documenting the landing, which he assumed was that of an American
> millionaire, as part of his hobby.
Udhay, t
Part of the problem IMHO is the "double click' where you click 100% more times
than you need to click.
Its a bit like ..
Part of the problem IMHO is the "double click' where you click 100% more times
than you need to click.
A single click reduces clicking effort by half. The act of clicking
On Fri October 20 2006 3:48 am, Kragen Javier Sitaker wrote:
> Are there large obstacles to such people becoming self-employed in
> India today? It seems to me that the obstacles for some of them are
> becoming larger in the US; for example, teachers are mostly employees
> due to students' desire
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 09:37:51 +0100 (BST), bonobashi wrote:
> Very briefly, while the overt aim is to 're-position' TIME
> magazine, the covert one is stated clearly, almost too clearly to
> make it covert - that of reaching a different cross-section of
> readership, thereby attracting a dif
We have been trained to 'click' to perform actions by the various
windowing systems (x, mac, windoze). Do we think we are going to stop
clicking in the future? Will it save is from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?
I found this interesting website on these lines.
http://www.dontclick.it/
regards,
Venka
http://www.idiagram.com/CP/cpprocess.html
Very interesting visual model to break it down to individual components.
I wonder how scalable this model is... Any thoughts?
regards,
Venkat
I DID enjoy! Thank you.
Deepa.
On 10/20/06, Aditya Kapil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Enjoy
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/dailymail.html?in_article_id=411526&in_page_id=1790 22:54pm 19th October 2006
The shenanigans between Paul and Heather McCartney, as revealed in
Enjoyhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/dailymail.html?in_article_id=411526&in_page_id=1790
22:54pm 19th October 2006
The shenanigans between Paul and Heather McCartney, as
revealed in the court papers published in the Mail this week, reveal
the kind of tempestuous relations
