Srini Ramakrishnan [21/01/08 09:57 +0530]:
How safe do you feel when you are in the presence of a policeman,
politician, government bureaucrat when you transact official business
in one line -
How safe would you feel as a muslim in gujarat?
On Jan 21, 2008 9:57 AM, Srini Ramakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would fit nicely into the emigree-to-USA crowd. So, my additional
> question to them is, how safe do you feel about living in India?
Personally, I think the fact of being an 'alien' will add significant worry.
So long as I'
I assume that question largely went out to the Indians on the list who
would fit nicely into the emigree-to-USA crowd. So, my additional
question to them is, how safe do you feel about living in India?
How safe do you feel when you are in the presence of a policeman,
politician, government bureauc
Gautam John wrote: [ on 09:34 AM 1/21/2008 ]
Do stories such as this affect your thinking or actual
living/working/studying in the US?
Speaking for myself:
Stories such as this *certainly* affect my (already reluctant and as
infrequent as possible) travels to the US. When you add officially
Do stories such as this affect your thinking or actual
living/working/studying in the US?
___
IN a recent morning interview in a Midtown Manhattan office Ramak
Fazel came across as the quintessential world citizen: tall, slim and
elegant, his English tinged with an untraceable acce
On Sunday 20 Jan 2008 10:32 pm, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote:
> I always thought it was the Chinese who sold the nuke to PK!
Thanks for posting yet another whistleblowing article. The Chinese passed
actual (tested) designs of bombs to Pakistan. But a lot of other technology
related to refining and b
On Jan 20, 2008 10:32 PM, Srini Ramakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always thought it was the Chinese who sold the nuke to PK!
A valuable secret like that, you don't sell just once!
-- Charles
I always thought it was the Chinese who sold the nuke to PK!
Cheeni
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3216737.ece
Also on BB, http://www.boingboing.net/2008/01/19/fbi-buries-docs-show.html
>From The Sunday Times
January 20, 2008
FBI denies file exposing nucle
The newer shredders in use by the US agencies after the Iran incident use
pulping and chemical destruction. Now if the US government were to ever need
to hide secrets, they'd do it better than the Stazi... just saying. And,
Germany's automatic unshredder is just the largest and the most automated,
Hi Udhay,
Even before the advent of computers ( and improvement of algorithms to do
this), similiar thing has happened in the past. It was for the US,
apparently Iranians have reconstructed large fractions of documents which
Americans had shredded (embasy incident). Lesson's from the past missed
Very cool, and very thought-provoking. Shades of
both Brin's Transparent Society, and the librarian from _Snow Crash_ in here.
Just like digital data is only considered safely
erased when the substrate (e.g, a hard disk) is
irrecoverably destroyed, so too, here.
Anybody recall the last line
11 matches
Mail list logo
