On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Srini Ramakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cool! You just gave everyone on silk an imaginary Erdos number. ;-)
>
> But how? Have you written a paper with Perry?
I think that's where the 'imaginary' part comes in.
Udhay
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pob
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool! You just gave everyone on silk an imaginary Erdos number. ;-)
But how? Have you written a paper with Perry?
Cheeni
Cool! You just gave everyone on silk an imaginary Erdos number. ;-)
-- b
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Perry E. Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Abhishek Hazra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My Udhay number is probably 2
>>
>> would any one on silk have a Erdos number of 2 (or 1) by an
On Friday 07 Nov 2008 1:20:55 am Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Do you believe that so long as I continue to brush my teeth, the
> volcanos will be kept at bay?
>
>
> Perry
>
> PS as a child I was less diligent about dental hygiene and, at the
> same time, Mount Saint Helens violently erupted.
You hav
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 02:58:57PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> I don't own a TV because I can't stop watching them when they're
> nearby.
It gets worse when you're deprived. Anything movable hits you then like
a lead brick in the solar plexus.
On the other hand, if I'm online I can't get an
"Srini Ramakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Another reason for not owning a TV is similar to the reason for
> avoiding alcohol: You know you have an addiction."
I don't own a TV because I can't stop watching them when they're
nearby.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Abhishek Hazra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>My Udhay number is probably 2
>
> would any one on silk have a Erdos number of 2 (or 1) by any chance?
Mine is at least a 3. I don't believe it to be a 2, but it is possible
that Gopinath, who I co-authored a paper with, wrote one with Erdos at
some
ss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 28 Oct 2008 1:08:11 am Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Your claim, reproduced above, is that somehow the US has patched its
>> weak spots in its security and that we are therefore now more
>> secure. Neither activity you cite has any actual value in increasin
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/upgrade/4273674.html
MIT's Guru of Low-Tech Engineering Fixes the World on $2 a Day
>From impoverished Peruvian villages to MIT's D-Lab, professor Amy Smith
and her spirited team of engineers are on a mission: Fight global
poverty and improve living stan
