>It's the 80:20 rule. If you have to spend the >same amount of effort
>>crafting a Windows exploit as a Mac >exploit you'd be stupid to write a
>Mac exploit. When someone, in the context >of malware, says the Mac
>isn't "mainstream" they aren't dissing the >Mac platform, they're
>observing the real
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Casey O'Donnell
wrote:
> Furthermore, I think the argument simply doesn't hold water any more,
> given the much more widespread use of OS X now compared to a few years
> ago. To say that OS X isn't in "mainstream use" just doesn't make
> sense to me.
It's the 80:
Certainly there's no requirement for the acquisition of any specific
kind of device. We're making clients for iPhone, iPad, Kindle, and
Android, but you'll be able to use a regular ol' web browser too.
These days my archery practice is limited to going out into the
backyard and using a target les
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> There's number of attacks, and there's intrinsic vulnerability. OS X
> is pretty vulnerable, Linux less so, and *BSD even less. Then you
> must differentiate by desktop vs. server, and whether the systems
> are well-kept, hardened or stock, etc
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:40:33AM +0530, Kiran K Karthikeyan wrote:
> Isn't the lack of mainstream use the main reason Apple and Linux don't see
> as many attacks? Therefore, if all of Google were on Apple and Linux, I
> guess there is enough reason for a hacker to build up his skills on those
>
On Tuesday 01 Jun 2010 9:40:33 am Kiran K Karthikeyan wrote:
> Isn't the lack of mainstream use the main reason Apple and Linux don't see
> as many attacks? Therefore, if all of Google were on Apple and Linux, I
> guess there is enough reason for a hacker to build up his skills on those
> OSes?
I
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Kiran K Karthikeyan
wrote:
> Isn't the lack of mainstream use the main reason Apple and Linux don't see
> as many attacks? Therefore, if all of Google were on Apple and Linux, I
> guess there is enough reason for a hacker to build up his skills on those
> OSes?
I'
Yes, but
It is enough to be ahead, 'a little ahead' meaning a knee ahead at least, on
either side. While a normal player would prefer to take an off-side shot while
riding off the other guy, anybody 4 goals or more can take a near-side shot
with almost the same ease.
What matters is how b
Can't say I'm likely to participate in anything where the barrier to
entry is iPhone acquisition, but as I happen to believe many current
equestrian disciplines are the ossified remnants of what was
previously useful at different epochs in mounted combat, you might
just tempt me, if you can
On 1 June 2010 12:22, Sruthi Krishnan wrote:
> I think in the last thread on paid news too this piece by Sevanti
> Ninan was mentioned. Don't remember too well, but it is worth another
> dekko -- 'Paid news for dummies'.
>
> http://www.thehindu.com/mag/2010/03/28/stories/2010032850090300.htm
>
>
I think in the last thread on paid news too this piece by Sevanti
Ninan was mentioned. Don't remember too well, but it is worth another
dekko -- 'Paid news for dummies'.
http://www.thehindu.com/mag/2010/03/28/stories/2010032850090300.htm
An excerpt:
So what are the honchos in charge saying about
11 matches
Mail list logo
