On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 05:51, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Does it even exist or is it, like such a lot of ngos, either defunct or
> merely existing as a shell company for some corporate interest or the
> other?
No clue, was hoping Delhi-walla's here would know. I suspect they do
exist as the
Does it even exist or is it, like such a lot of ngos, either defunct or
merely existing as a shell company for some corporate interest or the
other?
. [02/06/11 05:25 +]:
Hi,
Does anyone know where the Centre for Public Interest Litigation
(CPIL) society is located and/or how they can be co
Hi,
Does anyone know where the Centre for Public Interest Litigation
(CPIL) society is located and/or how they can be contacted? The
society[0] seems to be around half a decade old but I could not locate
their website nor contact information online. Any leads welcome.
[0] http://www.indiankanoon.
On 06/02/2011 08:21 AM, ss wrote:
Crystal clear. But is there a typo in the 76th word?
The corrected version is as follows:
fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun)
fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun)
fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun)
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 2:53:08 pm Anand Manikutty wrote:
> P.S. A sample construct of this grammar is the sentence below :
>
> fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun)
> fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Noun)
> fish(Noun) fish(Noun) fish(Nou
A rough summary or framework follows:
>Bits: the atomic form of information
>Words: the molecular form of information
>Money: the only truly fungible form of >information
>Thoughts?
Sounds more like a classical world view, than a post quantum ( post whatever
latest) ...
Have to admit I have rea
I've just started reading James Gleick's _The Information_ [1] (see here
[2] for an appreciation by Cory) and I just thought of one additional
semantic perspective to view the book, which I thought I'd throw out for
the list to tear to bits (heh).
It strikes me that it might be a good idea to read
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:54:33PM +0530, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote:
> On 01-Jun-2011, at 3:05 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> > Things do evolve! There were badgers .. and mushrooms ..
> >
> > http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
>
> And nyan cat... http://nyan.cat/
>
unsuckscab tiredoldme
On 01-Jun-2011, at 3:05 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Things do evolve! There were badgers .. and mushrooms ..
>
> http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
And nyan cat... http://nyan.cat/
Things do evolve! There were badgers .. and mushrooms ..
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
Anand Manikutty [01/06/11 02:23 -0700]:
There has been a discussion on the Internets on "Buffalo Buffalo ..." ever since
Paul Krugman posted about the sentence on his New York Times blog. Brad DeLong
po
Anand, I mean wow, too much wow :)
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Anand Manikutty wrote:
> There has been a discussion on the Internets on "Buffalo Buffalo ..."
> ever since Paul Krugman posted about the sentence on his New York Times
> blog. Brad DeLong posted about it also. Brad DeLong got i
There has been a discussion on the Internets on "Buffalo Buffalo ..." ever
since
Paul Krugman posted about the sentence on his New York Times blog. Brad DeLong
posted about it also. Brad DeLong got it up to 10 buffalo, but more is
possible.
This is a matter of international significance and so
12 matches
Mail list logo
