In fact it's pretty much impossible to bottom post. Both on my phone and
laptop browser screen everything (including quoted text and response) gets
formatted as quoted text. It's really painful.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 20:21 Shrabonti Bagchi wrote:
> The top and bottom posting debate has been made
The top and bottom posting debate has been made redundant by the fact that
most people now respond from their phones, which make it pretty painful to
bottom post. Lahar, you won.
On 08-Nov-2016 2:32 pm, "Preetha Chari-Srinivas" wrote:
> I second Deepa's take on this group.
> Cheers,
> Preetha.
>
I second Deepa's take on this group.
Cheers,
Preetha.
On Nov 8, 2016 2:29 PM, "Deepa Mohan" wrote:
> This list always gives me words I didn't know before, Thank you Dave.
> Intercalated" is now (by me) properly considered and accepted.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Dave Long wrote
This list always gives me words I didn't know before, Thank you Dave.
Intercalated" is now (by me) properly considered and accepted.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Dave Long wrote:
>> Bangalore, Delhi, Chennai, Silk, Satin, Top Posting.
>
>
> (with apologies to Stan Kelly-Bootle)
> Should po
Bangalore, Delhi, Chennai, Silk, Satin, Top Posting.
(with apologies to Stan Kelly-Bootle)
Should posted replies be "above" or "below"? My compromise of
"intercalated" was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.
This is like a bad cover version of We Didn't Start The Fire.
How about "unBaching", "unBeethovening" etc?
Lahar, caught me in just the right silly mood!
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Lahar Appaiah wrote:
> Since it's Silk, perhaps we should call it "unraveling"?
>
> Or, Un-Bolero-ing.
>
> Or, De-XUV-ing.
>
> Like, "Stop DeXuving the thread".
>
> On 8 No
Since it's Silk, perhaps we should call it "unraveling"?
Or, Un-Bolero-ing.
Or, De-XUV-ing.
Like, "Stop DeXuving the thread".
On 8 Nov 2016 2:00 p.m., "Venkat Mangudi - Silk"
wrote:
> If not thread drift, what’s the fun in Silk? :P
>
> Cheers,
> Venkat
>
>
>
> > On 08-Nov-2016, at 3:13 AM, Pr
I think we have got *above* the
where-the-response-email-should-be-situated controversy. Gmail has
decided it for me, at least.
By the way...I've been hearing "Namma Bengalooru" for quite a while now.
Deepa.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Venkat Mangudi - Silk
wrote:
> If not thread drift, wha
If not thread drift, what’s the fun in Silk? :P
Cheers,
Venkat
> On 08-Nov-2016, at 3:13 AM, Priyanka Sachar wrote:
>
> In all this hullabaloo did people forget to outrage about quoting "above"
> the previous mail? 😂😁😛 :p
>
> On 8 Nov 2016 09:26, "Preetha Chari-Srinivas" wrote:
>
>> Bangal
Bangalore, Delhi, Chennai, Silk, Satin, Top Posting.
This is like a bad cover version of We Didn't Start The Fire.
-Lahar
On 8 Nov 2016 1:43 p.m., "Priyanka Sachar" wrote:
> In all this hullabaloo did people forget to outrage about quoting "above"
> the previous mail? 😂😁😛 :p
>
> On 8 Nov 2016
In all this hullabaloo did people forget to outrage about quoting "above"
the previous mail? 😂😁😛 :p
On 8 Nov 2016 09:26, "Preetha Chari-Srinivas" wrote:
> Bangalore has never been addressed as such, since the namma wave has
> caught on, in Chennai only :-)
> Cheers,
> Preetha.
>
> On Nov 8, 201
11 matches
Mail list logo
