On 3/15/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Silk wrote:
> one thing to think about is while CRAP systems are crap, could they not
> help
> develop a new underlying protocol that actually works better, because of
> there increased spam rate? maybe if
one thing to think about is while CRAP systems are crap, could they not help
develop a new underlying protocol that actually works better, because of
there increased spam rate? maybe if we all start using them we can actually
kill SMTP and drown it in a world of captcha-like annoyances.
in any c
On 2/22/07, Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
Here I am again, trying to abuse the goodwill of the legal initiates
lurking on the list with a hypothetical scenario.
1. Suppose someone writes a GPLed POP3 server.
2. Suppose company X, which develops a proprietary program, needs s
... write an introduction.
Actually i dont know any of you, nor even how i found this list, and
none of you would know me ...
My name is Michael Silk (Thats why I joined it, I think ...) and when
i first joined i was under the assumption it was a list to discuss
information security or similar
