On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2008-05-03 14:19:38 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > General photography... thats why I want something with a zoom range...
>
> Then the 100-400 ought to be good for you.
I just wanted to comment on your ex
At 2008-05-03 14:19:38 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> General photography... thats why I want something with a zoom range...
Then the 100-400 ought to be good for you.
(Note that although it's small for a "real" telephoto lens, it's a lot
larger and heavier than "ordinary" lenses. You should
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> >
> > I am looking for a L Series lens for my Canon...
>
> (I'm assuming you mean an L-series telephoto lens.)
>
Yep
>
> > Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM
> >
> http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100-400mm-f4-5-5-6L-Telephoto-Cameras/
Hi ashok underscore.
At 2008-05-02 19:43:22 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am looking for a L Series lens for my Canon...
(I'm assuming you mean an L-series telephoto lens.)
> Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM
> http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100-400mm-f4-5-5-6L-Telephoto-Cameras/dp/B7
Hi,
I am looking for a L Series lens for my Canon... the one which seems to fit my
budget is this one:
Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100-400mm-f4-5-5-6L-Telephoto-Cameras/dp/B7GQLS/
any first hand opinions ?... is this significantly better than a good
Sigma