On 28/07/06 13:54 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> I think binary does very well even on the lunatic fringe.
True, false, null.
And for thedailywtf.com fans,
True, false, null, FileNotFound
Ternary has a pretty old history.
Devdas Bhagat
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:32:48PM +0200, Dave Long wrote:
> On the gripping hand, maybe there is some computational embodiment that
> more naturally lends itself to 3x3 decision tables? Is it possible to
> compute with triplet spin states? (consider this under the caveat that
> it's all very
Balanced ternary, otherwise known as "maths for moties"? I'm afraid I
lack time currently[0] to decently investigate this system; for now,
just a few scattered impressions:
On the one hand, binary divisions can certainly be accused of
over-simplification. In the special cases where it's poss
i thought it was pretty fascinating, especially since several years ago i
had explored similar tristate systems for the specific application of data
compression.
At 03:20 26/07/2006, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
Note: I've not yet read the article, only skimmed it. In my copious spare
time, I plan
> PS: I wonder how this guy (I assume he reads silk through the
> yahoogroups archive - he doesn't seem to be on the main list) settled
> on the three names below as the people to approach.
You three post the most messages.
Badri
>
>>Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: Abhijit <
Udhay Shankar N wrote:
PS: I wonder how this guy (I assume he reads silk through the
yahoogroups archive - he doesn't seem to be on the main list) settled on
the three names below as the people to approach.
esp why me .. I flunked maths at least three times before I could pass
it in my BSc co
Note: I've not yet read the article, only skimmed it. In my copious
spare time, I plan to do so. Meanwhile, I'm curious what the rest of
the list (hi, Dave!) thinks of this.
Udhay
PS: I wonder how this guy (I assume he reads silk through the
yahoogroups archive - he doesn't seem to be on the
