Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: [ on 12:23 AM 10/29/2007 ] I figured that there'd surely be other comments about the news worthy parts of Suresh's message, but reading /. is well interesting. I thought not too many did that these days. I still do, at +3. I got an added incentive to continue doing so

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Srini Ramakrishnan [29/10/07 00:23 +0530]: On 10/28/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. So you still read /. ? huh... Like I said,

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Madhu M. Kurup
Hi, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: On 10/28/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. So you still read /. ? huh... Still do. Also read comm

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:43:32AM +0530, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: > I stopped reading reddit when they decided they were too grown up for > nsfw.reddit.com I wouldn't really care for a NSFW reddit (both because it's boring, and because I have no problems to view anything I want at my "work", bu

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Srini Ramakrishnan
On 10/29/07, Srini Ramakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/29/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I used to live on reddit, but it's gone all to shit in hyperexponential > > time. They now even killed my.reddit.com, and recommended is full of > > crap as ever. I can't bel

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Srini Ramakrishnan
On 10/29/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I used to live on reddit, but it's gone all to shit in hyperexponential > time. They now even killed my.reddit.com, and recommended is full of > crap as ever. I can't believe we still don't have a personal news > service in end-2007. I st

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:23:50AM +0530, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote: > P.S. I figured that there'd surely be other comments about the news > worthy parts of Suresh's message, but reading /. is well interesting. > I thought not too many did that these days. I do occasionally (when I ocassionally pa

Re: [silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Srini Ramakrishnan
On 10/28/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, > I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. So you still read /. ? huh... Cheeni P.S. I figured that there'd surely be other comme

[silk] How the US house judiciary committee protects whistleblowers

2007-10-28 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
... or doesn't. I don't normally forward /. trash along, but in my defense, I saw this link elsewhere, by which time it appears heavily /.ed. The US House Judiciary Committee recently emailed all of its potential whistleblowers information about how it was restructuring its whistleblower program.