Silkers,
Andrew Orlowski
( http://www.theregister.com/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ )
makes a valid point that there are many flawed entries;
however, in fairness to Wikipedia, most new projects
have quality problems here and there. The typical article
on Wikipedia is remar
sorry, i meant to annotate, not just linkspam.
my favourite quotes from the article are:
"If you don't like an entry, you can fix it yourself. Which is rather like
going to a restaurant for a date, being served terrible food, and then
being told by the waiter where to find the kitchen. But you
interesting article criticising wikipedia (and its supporters... like clay
shirky, is he still on silklist?)
http://www.theregister.com/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/
