Re: [silk] silklist Digest, Vol 66, Issue 12

2015-05-25 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:08:34AM +0530, Lahar Appaiah wrote: > I find bottom posting a little .. dinosaur-ish. Corporate email has > effectively institutionalized top-posting, and the default now seems to be > to top-post for a general reply, and to reply inline for specific points. > I find it a

Re: [silk] silklist Digest, Vol 66, Issue 12

2015-05-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Let us call it a hangover from the days of 9600 bps modems and slow uucp feeds. —srs > On 25-May-2015, at 11:08 am, Lahar Appaiah wrote: > > I find bottom posting a little .. dinosaur-ish. Corporate email has > effectively institutionalized top-posting, and the default now seems to be > to t

Re: [silk] silklist Digest, Vol 66, Issue 12

2015-05-24 Thread Lahar Appaiah
I find bottom posting a little .. dinosaur-ish. Corporate email has effectively institutionalized top-posting, and the default now seems to be to top-post for a general reply, and to reply inline for specific points. I find it amusing how the bottom-posting brigade tries to claim that top-posting i

Re: [silk] silklist Digest, Vol 66, Issue 12

2015-05-24 Thread Dave Long
If you select the bit of text that you want to reply to and then click 'reply', Gmail will format it as a bottom-post. Try it! :) OK, here goes. But why is not default? The just-so story is so that one can show respect for a cultivated audience (or at least distinguish oneself from the une