CS>Beck's protocol...

2003-06-30 Thread M. G. Devour
Sara wrote: > Interesting. How does the Beck protocal relate to the Dr. Clark > protocal? They sound familiar. I have used the Clark protocal for > parasite cleansing and organ function, and magnetic pulsing is a big > part of that, also ozonated water (or olive oil) plus CS are > suggested. Wha

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-28 Thread Marshall Dudley
rob gr wrote: > What is the skin effect? Sorry for my ignorance here. When an electric current flows it produces a magnetic field. A change in current is opposed by the magnetic field. So what happens is that if you have a high frequency (usually a megahertz or more), the most of the current en

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-28 Thread Alvin Rose
-list@eskimo.com Date: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:13 PM Subject: Re: CS>Beck's protocol >What is the skin effect? Sorry for my ignorance here. > >Also, I have been thinking about using a zapper, or beck device for my lyme >disease. But i have a question about the electical cur

Re: CS>Beck's protocol (Humor)

2000-07-28 Thread Harvey Flatbush
At 12:12 AM 7/28/00 -0500, you wrote: What is the skin effect? Sorry for my ignorance here. Also, I have been thinking about using a zapper, or beck device for my lyme disease. But i have a question about the electical current. Is the current evenly distributed throughout the body. I would thi

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-27 Thread rob gr
@eskimo.com To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Beck's protocol Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:23:57 EDT he doesnt claim that l dont think..he made it but l am not sure. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest s

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-25 Thread Marshall Dudley
Alvin Rose wrote: > Hi Katie > The clark zapper has nothing to do with blood electrification as the potential > is to low to get conduction..It is a parasite killer which has a low level > 30 kc output and does not induce a current flow in the blood (50 to 100 > microamps) > The Beck protocol requ

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-25 Thread Katie Jay
Hi all, I made the mistake of reading my emails (and deleting them) from most recent to least recent and did not get the full benefit of the reactions to Marshall's post. In a nut shell, is there a lot of disagreement about M.'s observation regarding the zapper vs. Beck's device (see below)? I ge

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Inga34
he doesnt claim that l dont think..he made it but l am not sure. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the wo

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Dean T. Miller
Hi Alvin, On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:45:06 -0700, Alvin Rose wrote: >Take your sisters zapper and put a 0 to 1000 microamp meter in series >with one lead...look for 50 to 100 microamp current flow in the circuit.. (A DC meter won't show anything with a Zapper and an AC meter is highly inaccurate --

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Dean T. Miller
Hi Marshall, On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:46:10 -0400, Marshall Dudley wrote: >30 Khz is way too low for skin effect to occur. Umm, nope. One or two kHz has little skin effect, but there's still some. As you go up in frequency the skin effect becomes more pronounced, and by the time you're up a few

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
You are 1000 to 1 too low for skin effect. Look at: http://www.spectrum-soft.com/news/fall97/skin.html to see graphs of skin effect on a 14 guage wire. As diameter increases the effect decreases, so when you compare the diameter of an arm with a 14 guage wire, you can see the effect is nil at 3

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
No. If he claims it is the Clark zapper, it should be the same. Marshall ing...@aol.com wrote: > hi marshall..l have no clue how dons zapper compares to all that you > listed..do you? > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-li

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Inga34
hi marshall..l have no clue how dons zapper compares to all that you listed..do you? -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@e

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Can't say for sure. I built mine according to the instructions in Clark's book for her. For myself, I use a pulse generator set to 10 volts, 30 khz, unipolar with a resistor in the output. Spin a few dials, and I have Beck's unit if I want. Marshall ing...@aol.com wrote: > hi marshall.. l hav

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Inga34
hi marshall.. l have don's zapper..is that the one your sis used to beat lyme? what type do you and your family ? -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Alvin Rose wrote: > Hi Marshall > I have a clark zapper connected to me now with a microampmeter in series > and I don't get any current..also the maximum safe current flow should be > in the 50 to 100 Microamp levelat 2000 ohms impedence. I will pull out the scope and check it again. Marsha

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Alvin Rose
I use a Sencore sc-60 oscilloscope blue_eyes wrote: > Hi Marshall, > > What did you use to measure the current of the 30 khz. signal? > Multimeter? Oscilloscope? > > The manual for my multimeter does not indicate frequency ranges > or limits with regard to AC current readings, so I don't have > a

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Oscilloscope, measured voltage drop across the 1k resistor. The 10 mA was actually a peak value, rms or average would be half that. One cannot count on getting an accurate measure at that frequency with a digital meter. I found that virtually all the voltage appears across the resistor when o

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Alvin Rose
you're right...but the 50 to 100 microamps as measured in the blood is where we need it to do the joba 30 khz which might conduct more current away from the blood vessels in skin effect is great for parasites. that's makes good sense. blue_eyes wrote: > Hi Guys... > > I was under the

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread blue_eyes
Hi Marshall, What did you use to measure the current of the 30 khz. signal? Multimeter? Oscilloscope? The manual for my multimeter does not indicate frequency ranges or limits with regard to AC current readings, so I don't have a clue if it is as accurate at 30 khz. as it is at 60 hz. David Mar

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Alvin Rose
Hi Marshall I have a clark zapper connected to me now with a microampmeter in series and I don't get any current..also the maximum safe current flow should be in the 50 to 100 Microamp levelat 2000 ohms impedence. Marshall Dudley wrote: > Alvin Rose wrote: > > > Hi Marshall > > Take your sis

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
blue_eyes wrote: > Hi Guys... > > I was under the impression that the 50 to 100 microamps spec. > relates to *as measured in the blood*. > > At 30 khz., the "skin effect" might conduct most of the usable > current away form the blood vessels, whereas, at 4 hz. it may be > more of a direct

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread blue_eyes
Hi Guys... I was under the impression that the 50 to 100 microamps spec. relates to *as measured in the blood*. At 30 khz., the "skin effect" might conduct most of the usable current away form the blood vessels, whereas, at 4 hz. it may be more of a direct electrical effect than a frequen

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Alvin Rose wrote: > Hi Marshall > Take your sisters zapper and put a 0 to 1000 microamp meter in series > with one lead...look for 50 to 100 microamp current flow in the circuit.. > you won't get any current flow as the voltage is too low to overcome the skin > resistence I checked the current fl

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Alvin Rose
Hi Marshall Take your sisters zapper and put a 0 to 1000 microamp meter in series with one lead...look for 50 to 100 microamp current flow in the circuit.. you won't get any current flow as the voltage is too low to overcome the skin resistence between the surface and arterys in the attatchment poi

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Not according to Beck. But I disagree. I feel they are essentually equivalent, in fact I personally prefer the zapper. My sister beat lyme using the zapper for the electrification. Marshall Katie Jay wrote: > Does the Clark zapper count for the blood electrification needed as part of > Beck's

Re: CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-23 Thread Alvin Rose
Hi Katie The clark zapper has nothing to do with blood electrification as the potential is to low to get conduction..It is a parasite killer which has a low level 30 kc output and does not induce a current flow in the blood (50 to 100 microamps) The Beck protocol required the blood purifier as well

CS>Beck's protocol

2000-07-23 Thread Katie Jay
Does the Clark zapper count for the blood electrification needed as part of Beck's 4-point protocol? Thanks -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- s