RE: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-18 Thread Jim Holmes
Oligiodynamic? -Original Message- From: gallen4...@aol.com [mailto:gallen4...@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 1:59 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET Garnet, Some time ago, like maybe a couple of years, there was quit

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-18 Thread Garnet
I have not had a practical reason to look into it. Garnet On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 22:07, Dan Nave wrote: > > Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET > > > > * From: Garnet wrote: > > * Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:29:15 > > > > I make 10 ppm CS but you

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-18 Thread Garnet
Actually my experience does not bear this out. I use ~10 ppm and I drink at least a cup a day, divided into 3-4 gulps. If there is something going around or if I feel off I increase this up to a quart a day or more. If I stick at my maintenance dose when I start to feel yucky or fatigued I sometime

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread Dan Nave
Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET * From: Garnet wrote: * Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:29:15 > I make 10 ppm CS but you can use what ever concentration CS you have on hand. It would make it more effective presumable to use a higher concentration CS but I get floaters whe

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread Mike Monett
Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET From: GAllen4296 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:03:47 http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m74050.html > Garnet, > Some time ago, like maybe a couple of years, there was quite a > lengthy discussion of what PPM of CS is needed to cu

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread GAllen4296
Garnet, Some time ago, like maybe a couple of years, there was quite a lengthy discussion of what PPM of CS is needed to cure something. As I remember, the conclusion was that ppm is largely irrelevant -- 2or3 ppm being as effective as 20 or 30. There is a technical name for this condition

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread sol
Last time I changed one, it was pointed out to me that it would make it very difficult to follow the thread in the archives. So I did not change it, in any of my replies. As it is a search for one of the key words in the posts will bring up a post and the subject header, which can then be follow

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread Mike Monett
Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET From: Denise Rollheiser Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:57:52 > Could the subject of this thread be possible CHANGED!?!? I am > attempting to learn about CS and find it very VERY disheartening > when subject lines can not be changed

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread Denise Rollheiser
: "Garnet" To: "Silver List" Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:14 AM Subject: Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET > The recommend oral dose is 4cc per day of 99% - although people have > consumed much higher amounts, this is what Dr Jacob recommends probably > bec

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-17 Thread Garnet
The recommend oral dose is 4cc per day of 99% - although people have consumed much higher amounts, this is what Dr Jacob recommends probably because it is well below what would even cause most people the transient side effects like headache and slight queasy stomach. The toxic dose is 44,000 times

Re: CS>Is it really this quiet? GARNET

2004-10-15 Thread Bruce Anderson
Garnet, Could you please give the DMSO, CS ratio? I think I'd like to add that mixture to the war chest. Many thanks, Bruce Garnet wrote: Combining oral CS and oral DMSO may make the difference here. DMSO will penetrate and carry CS to tissues that it might not normally penetrate unless ver