"Herb" writes:
> There is no reason to try to keep venders off the list because, if
> they follow the rules and respect the fellow members, we will likely
> not even know that they are venders.
I agree with this. The key point is buy-in to both the letter of the
list rules *and* to the mission.
Several vendors post on their websites apparently legitimate,
independent tests of CS made with their machines. One tests on
so-called "toilet water," another on strep. bacteria. At some
point I think it would be valuable to collect such independent lab.
tests in a single folder entitled
rogalt...@aol.com wrote:
> Herb: I think the major problem here is that we are not even on the
> threshold of deciding the CRITERIA of what constitutes good or
> excellent CS. That's why I believe that we will be wasting our time by
> allowing one vender to debate another about whose CS is best. A
In a message dated 10/4/2001 1:10:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
herb321...@aol.com writes:
> I question that any vender of any value will not blow his own horn on their
> own products, especially if they really have done tests and conduced
> trials. These tests and trials can be shared with the
In a message dated 10/04/2001 4:34:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
nour...@ix.netcom.com writes:
> Peter:
> >>Furthermore, I believe that vendors should be able to discuss freely the
> pros
> >>and cons of various cs products, including their own, so long it is done
> in a
> >>civil manner. Witho
5 matches
Mail list logo
