CS>Re: Current limitation Please check my math
From: Dave Sawatzky
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:17:53
Sorry, Dave, I forgot to mention another aspect of the shock hazard.
You stated:
> The purpose here is for greater shock protection in case of
> polarity reversal.
If y
Repost - sympatico hung when I tried to send. I don't think it went, but if so,
I
apologize for the duplicate post.
-------
CS>Re: Current limitation Please check my math
From: Dave Sawatzky
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:17:
Hi Mike Monett
You wrote
> It sounds like the generator has a series resistor, but it's not
> apparent what value is. The above numbers looked a bit strange, so I
> tried to calculate it.
>The first run of 6 hrs produced 24.5V and 3.24mA. The series
> resistance calculates to:
Thanks Mike,
I've been bit a few times building my xmtrs!!
I'll keep your post so I will remember.
"Ole Bob"
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: s
Hi Bob,
> Re: CS>Re: Re: CS>RE: Current limitation Please check my math
> From: Robert Berger
> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:39:26
> Hi Mike,
> A clever solution to the problem of EIS power supplies.
> I have a few 330 v c supplies here to check with m
First order of misperception is that...you can't see ions.
What you are seeing is clouds of particles forming in two different
places under somewhat different conditions where the dissolved ionic
concentration in the container is the highest near the emmitting electrode
and the attracting e
Hi Mike,
A clever solution to the problem of EIS power supplies.
I have a few 330 v c supplies here to check with my wide anode system.
I believe that Trem is working on a system as a future sales item.
I will look into the NO3 and NO levels.
"Ole Bob"
--
The silver-list is a moderated f
Sorry, I goofed in my previous post on calculating the current density.
Here's a better calculation:
[...]
> The anode calculates out to a little over 1 square inch:
> A = pi * d * l
> = pi * 0.125 * 3
> = 1.1780972 sq. in.
That didn't sound right, so I looked up the actual w
> Re: CS>RE: Current limitation Please check my math
> From: Robert Berger
> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:27:03
> Hi Ed,
> First let us correct some errors.
[...]
> None of the LM series will work over 36 volts. You will have to
> find the drawing that
--- Robert Berger wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> First let us correct some errors.
>
> The anode the positive electrode is the one that
> supplies the silver . The
> cathode can be anything as it will silver plate.
In many cases I have seen colloid deposits flowing
from both polarity sides on the CS proce
Hi Ed,
First let us correct some errors.
The anode the positive electrode is the one that supplies the silver . The
cathode can be anything as it will silver plate.
#14 wire is 1/16" in diameter not 1/8"
In the calculation you only use the area of the anode (+) electrode. make it
large.
None o
1/8 inch is .125" not .064. .064 = about 1/16 "
Jim
edkas...@pacbell wrote:
Thanks Bob,
if the silver wire is 14 gauge (14 gauge = 0.064")
14 gauge = about 1/8 of an inch
the equalization would be
3.1416 x (0.064) x 7 (inches of wetted area)
measured on only one of the two silver wires.
eq
Thanks Bob,
if the silver wire is 14 gauge (14 gauge = 0.064")
14 gauge = about 1/8 of an inch
the equalization would be
3.1416 x (0.064) x 7 (inches of wetted area)
measured on only one of the two silver wires.
equals = 1.4070 ma
if a bend the negative silver wire so there is 14 inches of we
13 matches
Mail list logo
