Re: CS>a Dimensionless Quantity

LOL, yep, had the finger on the wrong key. Marshall missett wrote: > Did you mean 33&1/3? > > Never was a 22.3. > > - Original Message - > From: "Marshall Dudley" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 9:04 AM > Subject: Re: CS>a Dimen

Re: CS>a Dimensionless Quantity

red RPM's. We used to use a 30 RPM and then 40 RPM gearhead AC motors but they didn't shutoff automatically. The DC motors now shut down with generator shut down. I don't understand why we have such different experience. Trem - Original Message - From: Ode Coyote To:

CS>A Dimensionless Quantity

Hi, Ode. Yeah, let's here it for the zoo and all its radical inmates :-) There may be one comforting thought: a Faraday Law calculations would overestimate the silver ppm, due to over-unity valence, but a muriatic titration (either colorimetric or amperometric or both) would underestimate the sil

Re: CS>A Dimensionless Quantity

My vote goes to the zoo. This stuff can get SO WEIRD! ..then it does something different. :-) Ode At 09:45 AM 2/5/2004 -0500, you wrote: Hi, Ode, Thanks for your reply. Monovalency for the silver seems to be implicit in most calculations I have seen in applying Faraday's Electrolysis Equ