In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes:
_http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted=
all_
(http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted=all)
A pair of otherwise
Uh-oh, otherwise extinguished?
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 10:57 -0400, zzekel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted=all
LOL!!!
On Oct 18, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Malcolm wrote:
Uh-oh, otherwise extinguished?
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 10:57 -0400, zzekel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewant
ed=all
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the
hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the
collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple
Hi Steve,
That'll teach 'em:)) I love it!!
Craig
"A
pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the
hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the
collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would
ripple backward through time
5 matches
Mail list logo