Re: CSOT but Cool

2009-10-18 Thread ZZekelink
In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes: _http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted= all_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted=all) A pair of otherwise

Re: CSOT but Cool

2009-10-18 Thread Malcolm
Uh-oh, otherwise extinguished? On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 10:57 -0400, zzekel...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewanted=all

Re: CSOT but Cool

2009-10-18 Thread Clayton Family
LOL!!! On Oct 18, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Malcolm wrote: Uh-oh, otherwise extinguished? On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 10:57 -0400, zzekel...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 10/14/2009 7:20:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, stephen.nor...@ngc.com writes:

CSOT but Cool

2009-10-14 Thread Norton, Steve
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=4pagewant ed=all A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple

Re: CSOT but Cool

2009-10-14 Thread Craig Chamberlin
Hi Steve, That'll teach 'em:)) I love it!! Craig "A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time