A short answer to your direct inquiry is that your suggestion for determining an acceptable approach.....is yes. Direct evaluation is a simple, effective way to favorably resolve your question.
My intention, through posting the url on this topic, was simply, to avail some general parameters for the general list membership......not to persons as knowledgeable
in chemistry matters....as yourself (no discrimination against the less technically-informed is intended).
In partial answer to others observations/inquiries, I offer the following: The liposomal encapsulation of the vitamin C component markedly shifts some of the principal parameters of the resultant substance. e.g. the bowel tolerance (in about 85% of cases) is increased by at least 3X: absorbability of the released C fraction {at the delivery terminal) is, enormously increased [over 3000%, relative to a pure ascorbic acid fraction}; the tart/sharp taste is greatly reduced (the result of buffering to near neutral ph)---over that experienced with a standalone ascorbic acid fraction; the true, systemic, impact of an encapsulated Ascorbic Acid versus encapsulated Ascorbate has NOT been effectively measured (quantitatively, by us)....however, the OBSERVED responses appear evident and do favor the Ascorbate fraction.....in most cases; to maximize the benefits, without micromanagement of parameters and to minimize effects of quantitative variations of component! s (AA, Lecithin, Bicarb.), our best, repeatable results are achieved through assuring ADEQUATE lecithin (even if appreciable meniscus forms).
If one is dedicated toward order and precision....then more consistent results may be obtained by driving the resultant Ascorbate fraction as near to Neutral ph as is practical.....without using expensive lab equipment. Litmus paper or a low-end ph meter would enable this.
I repeat myself, it is VERY difficult to make a mistake of worrisome measure.
Even if one varies or either side of neutral ph. Also, if rather wide variations between liposomal encapsulated and unaltered ascorbic acid are present in the final solution.....
the only compromise is one relative, not catastrophic....in nature.
Although I would like to continue this message, my attention is required elsewhere, I must go now. I hope I have enlightened more than obscured with this post.
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : Re: CS>Sodium Ascorbate - the Health Benefits
Date : Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:32:24 -0400
From : Marshall Dudley
To : silver-list@eskimo.com
That article suggests finding one's personal dosage by gradually
increasing the dosage until you reach the bowel tolerance level. My
question is, if you are using the liposomal encapsulated form, does this
test apply? If it does not apply, then would the appropriate protocol
be to run the test with sodium ascorbate, then once the amount is
determined, take the same amount of sodium ascorbate liposomal encapsulated?
Thanks,
Marshall
Brooks Bradley wrote:
> Although I do not know anything about the people at this
> website and do not recommend anyones products.......
> the information presented here is quite acceptable as a "general
> assumption"source relating to sodium ascorbate.
> This s my cowardly response to those many people who have contacted me
> about this subject.
> My apologies for being unable to respond to each inquiry
> in a more complete manner.
> Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.regenerativenutrition.com/content.asp?id=420
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
>
> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour
>
>
>
>
>
>
