- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote odecoy...@alltel.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
I do believe that there is an absolute FTL communication medium...probably
having to do with nonlocality phenomenon fairy recently
David Bearrow wrote:
At 01:02 PM 8/16/04, you wrote:
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite well. In fact with
practice I got where I could drive the meter to either peg by just
concentrating on the plant with certain thoughts.
If that is true then you could use a plant as
I do believe that there is an absolute FTL communication medium...probably
having to do with nonlocality phenomenon fairy recently demonstrated by
instantantious electron [or was that photon?] rotation changes and called
Spooky action at a distance by Einstien.
It is non intrusive...that easily
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
David Bearrow wrote:
At 01:02 PM 8/16/04, you wrote:
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite well. In fact
with
practice I got where I could drive the meter to either peg by just
Ode and Marshall,
Spooky action at a distance???
RE-WIRING PLANTS: Frequencies of intent and conscious awareness?
When working with plants to create 'evidence', one has to establish with
the plants what rows will take the 'balance' - via botany criteria and
intent. Otherwise all the plants in
5ay1wk...@sneakemail.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
CSsignals and frequencies
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:33:24
...there is no way a signal can come from the body...
The problem
A resonant or sympathetic frequency and a generated or emitted frequency
ain't the same things.
The main difference is in where the energy comes from.
The origial post had to do with people and plants etc having some sort of
frequency as measured by some device, but didn't mention that it was a
At 08:54 PM 8/15/04, you wrote:
Does the lie detector use two electrodes? Seems it would have to.
It uses the principle of galvanic response. The theory is that our skin
varies in resistance depending on whether the pores are open or closed. It
appears that emotion can cause the pores
There's a difference between bodies having signals that can be measured with direct contact and signals being emmitted from them.
No one disputes galvanic skin response or that live cells communicate electrically.
Obviously, EEG machines work.
One unrelated subject does not prove a another,
You're welcome.
Backster has interested me for many years, since reading The Secret Life of
Plants many years ago.
Paul H
- Original Message -
From: William Missett
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
is told in depth in Christopher Bird's book,
The Secret Life of Plants. It might change your opinion. -
Original Message -From: Mike Monett
5ay1wk...@sneakemail.comTo: silver-list@eskimo.comSent: Sunday,
August 15, 2004 12:27 PMSubject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
CSsignals
Mike Monett wrote:
And I doubt it responded to menacing looks:)
Best Wishes,
Mike Monett
-
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite well. In fact with
practice I got where I could drive the meter to either peg by just
concentrating on the plant with certain thoughts.
Wayne Fugitt wrote:
Evening David,
Plants can change their resistance but emit no energy. Don't get your
terms mixed up. The plant had a variable resistance, NOT a transmission of
energy at a certain frequency.
Plants have fever, like humans. Temperatures change. Typically,
Ode Coyote wrote:
There's a difference between bodies having signals that can be measured with
direct contact and signals being emmitted from them.
No one disputes galvanic skin response or that live cells communicate
electrically.
Obviously, EEG machines work.
One unrelated subject does
Re: CSsignals and frequencies
From: Marshall Dudley
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:17:29
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m72540.html
Mike Monett wrote:
And I doubt it responded to menacing looks:)
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite well. In
fact
Hi Mike,
Gee, Marshall, that's amazing. What an astounding invention!
Just think - since a plant can read our thoughts, we don't need lie
detectors anymore. And we can replace all those high-paid guards
with just a few plants. In fact, most offices already have potted
plants
Mike Monett wrote:
Re: CSsignals and frequencies
From: Marshall Dudley
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:17:29
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m72540.html
Mike Monett wrote:
And I doubt it responded to menacing looks:)
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite
At 01:02 PM 8/16/04, you wrote:
Never tried that, but it did respond to thoughts quite well. In fact with
practice I got where I could drive the meter to either peg by just
concentrating on the plant with certain thoughts.
If that is true then you could use a plant as a telepathy antenna and
...there is no way a signal can come from the
body...
The problem with this statement is in a narrow
definition of the words, *signal* and *frequency*.
Royal Rife declared that all organisms had a specific
frequency that they operated at (or existed at). By
bombarding and overloading that
CSsignals and frequencies
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:33:24
...there is no way a signal can come from the body...
The problem with this statement is in a narrow definition of the
words, *signal* and *frequency*.
Hi Terry,
Everyone seems to be taking a narrow
At 10:29 AM 8/15/04, you wrote:
There is the well-known phenomenon of shattering a
wine glass using a strong audio signal set at a
specific frequency. What determines what frequency it
takes to shatter a wine glass? The frequency that
glass, or even that particular glass, exists at and
responds
Evening David,
Your talking about the resonant frequency of matter.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Resonance
I thought this to be the phonema that causes bridges and towers to
collapse.
Upon closer examination, this is not the same thing. When studying
bridges, 20 years ago, before I
Hello, Wayne,
You constructed a 53-foot suspension foot bridge?
There must be an interesting story why and how
you came to do this! Care to share?
Matthew
Message -
From: Mike Monett 5ay1wk...@sneakemail.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
CSsignals and frequencies
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 08:33:24
...there is no way a signal can come from
At 04:41 PM 8/15/04, you wrote:
Former top FBI lie detector expert Cleve Backster went into private
practice with similar services in NYC. One day in the 1960's (I believe)
he got bored and hooked his lie detector up to a plant growing in his
office, and to his surprise noted that it
An interview with Backster is here: http://www.derrickjensen.org/backster.html
Paul H
- Original Message -
From: William Missett
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Cc: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
Thanks for that link. It was a fascinating interview which goes far beyond
anything I've read about the man.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Holloway
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: CSsignals and frequencies
An interview
Evening David,
Plants can change their resistance but emit no energy. Don't get your
terms mixed up. The plant had a variable resistance, NOT a transmission of
energy at a certain frequency.
Plants have fever, like humans. Temperatures change. Typically,
resistance must change with
28 matches
Mail list logo
