Hi Phil, Ode,
These are always fun discussions :-) I appreciate your insights. And I
trust everyone in this group to help keep me on point if I should speak in
error. But I am not convinced of an error yet in this discussion, so let me
continue ;-)
As Ode eluded to with his question, CS, EIS,
Are you then referring to "Silver Oxide" nanoparticles?
metallic silver has no oxygen.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:25 PM Phil Morrison
wrote:
> Hi Victor, your comments welcome, as always.
>
> The reason I find CS superior to EIS is in the handling of "oxygen" pure
> and simple.
>
> We know most
Phil, PT, et el,
I'm not Ode, but I would strongly disagree with your statement Phil, as
there is no conclusive evidence that nanoparticles are superior to EIS. You
can make arguments on either side, but you cannot draw a conclusion. The
anecdotal evidence for the efficacy and safety of EIS is
I'm waiting for Ode to wade in!PT
On Saturday, January 16, 2021, 06:02:56 PM EST, Neville Munn
wrote:
Hmmm, my belief...Both have their own efficacy, but I personally would not
ingest that 'CS' product. We have come a long way since the 1800's product.
But then, each to his/her own
Hmmm, my belief...Both have their own efficacy, but I personally would not
ingest that 'CS' product. We have come a long way since the 1800's product.
But then, each to his/her own opinion and/or belief I guess.
N.
From: Phil Morrison
Sent: Sunday, 17 January
Very nice smooth talking history lesson but really nothing about ions versus
particles. Here is my contribution to the subject:
https://theartofmakingcolloidalsilver.com/ionic-versus-particulate/
From: Phil Morrison
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2021 9:23 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
