Re: Proposed rules from the FDA (long)

Charles L. Church wrote: > > > . they also are literally killing their own people with the > > restriction on alternative medicines ...the churches are just as > > bad for suppressing information for 1500 years to keep people under > > their control . > > > > "The Churches"??

RE: Proposed rules from the FDA (long)

> . they also are literally killing their own people with the > restriction on alternative medicines ...the churches are just as > bad for suppressing information for 1500 years to keep people under > their control . > "The Churches"??? A little broad, don't you think? While

Re: Proposed rules from the FDA (long)

brains wrote: > > M. G. Devour wrote: > > > I'm forwarding this without studying it in great detail, but I agree > > with William Busser that it is worth examining. Each may respond > > as their conscience dictates... > > > > Mike D. > > > > > > well in reply to the FDA having that much power ..

Re: Proposed rules from the FDA (long)

M. G. Devour wrote: > > I'm forwarding this without studying it in great detail, but I agree > with William Busser that it is worth examining. Each may respond > as their conscience dictates... > > Mike D. I wrote at least 5 different responses, none seem to fit, the only thing I can do is pray.

Re: Proposed rules from the FDA (long)

M. G. Devour wrote: > I'm forwarding this without studying it in great detail, but I agree > with William Busser that it is worth examining. Each may respond > as their conscience dictates... > > Mike D. > > well in reply to the FDA having that much power ...all governments are heading the sa