it's in librt, ie you need to add -lrt
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Clem Cole cl...@ccc.com wrote:
Cory,
Hmm, the PWD 3.0/System V later Posix shm(2) functions I would have
expected NetBSD to have picked up by now I agree. But no matter, I believe
you can use the mmap(2) mechanism if
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Rhialto wrote:
On Tue 28 Apr 2015 at 09:20:11 -0400, Clem Cole wrote:
Hmm, the PWD 3.0/System V later Posix shm(2) functions I would have
expected NetBSD to have picked up by now I agree.
Do you mean shmat(2), shmdt(2), shmget(2), etc? NetBSD has
On Tue 28 Apr 2015 at 16:44:53 -0700, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm wrote:
Are you suggesting that the memory reference semantics (and coherency
concerns) when using a mmap'ed shared memory area (between two or more
processes) is NOT equivalent to multiple threads in the same process
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Anyway, I thought that Stackens machines had met a sadder fate, so I
guess it is good news if Peter have them.
I think most survived in one way or another. Peter at least had this in
storage at some point:
