Re: [Simh] Fwd: Re: EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: > Not sure what kind of pains or issues you see. > I've been writing code that deals with network interfaces for many years, and > on Unix it usually just works and is very simple, while on Windows machines, > it's a pain in the

Re: [Simh] Fwd: Re: EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

Well truth be told even for most things I prefer Linux, I have been using Windows both as an end user and an IT professional since the early 90s, I am a rank amateur in Unix like systems. With Windows I know every in and out but I'm kind of clunky still with Unix. Also I am a very hands-on learner

Re: [Simh] Fwd: Re: EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

Not sure what kind of pains or issues you see. I've been writing code that deals with network interfaces for many years, and on Unix it usually just works and is very simple, while on Windows machines, it's a pain in the butt, if it works at all. And I've used the same code on both Linux,

[Simh] Fwd: Re: EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

Oops forgot to reply all -- Forwarded message -- From: "Ray Jewhurst" Date: Sep 4, 2016 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [Simh] EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK To: "Cory Smelosky" Cc: Well at least you are running bare metal. Trying to to run in

Re: [Simh] EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

Turns out I incorrectly configured NIC failover in my ESX config ;) I'm doing FreeBSD in ESX. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 4, 2016, at 16:29, Ray Jewhurst wrote: > > What is your guest OS? I have learned that for running emulator-on-vm, > Windows XP works best. The

Re: [Simh] EXT :Re: Ultrix 4.0 and DEQNA-LOCK

What is your guest OS? I have learned that for running emulator-on-vm, Windows XP works best. The worst is NetBSD and the kicker is that it is the only modern OS that runs TME easily. Ray On Sep 3, 2016 1:14 AM, "Cory Smelosky" wrote: > > It seems the network issues I was seeing