Interesting! Thanks for let us know about MP version of VAX-11/780. Will it be
787/789 emulation (VAX-11/785)? How about 784 (4 processors)? I recommend
atomic variables for interlocking. Check C++ reference for more information. It
requires least C++11 revisions (least GCC version 4.7). Also it
Hi Galen,
Not sure if this is already uploaded by you or not, but I found this:
https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_decpdp11aprammersReferenceManualJan80_68040338
Thanks,
Mike
On 05/19/2017 08:27 PM, Galen Tackett wrote:
I have a PDF of this manual scanned and OCRed on my Mac.
I couldn’t f
> On May 21, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Tim Stark wrote:
>
> Interesting! Thanks for let us know about MP version of VAX-11/780. Will it
> be 787/789 emulation (VAX-11/785)? How about 784 (4 processors)? I recommend
> atomic variables for interlocking.
Instead of relying on exotic C features, it migh
That is of course a strangely named copy of the original at Bitsavers, here:
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/apl/AA-5076B-TC_APL-11_Programmers_Reference_Manual_Jan80.pdf
paul
> On May 21, 2017, at 11:28 AM, Mike Markowski wrote:
>
> Hi Galen,
>
> Not sure if this is
>> On May 20, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>> Interesting. So you have the two CPUs as two processes? I wonder if doing
>> them as threads in a single process might be more straightforward. I did an
>> implementation of dual CPU CDC 6000 emulation that way (an extension to Tom
>
On 21/05/2017 15:54, Tim Stark wrote:
> Interesting! Thanks for let us know about MP version of VAX-11/780. Will it
> be 787/789 emulation (VAX-11/785)? How about 784 (4 processors)? I recommend
> atomic variables for interlocking. Check C++ reference for more information.
> It requires least C+
