Re: [Simh] New simulator - VAX-11/782

2017-05-25 Thread Sergey Oboguev
Matt Burke wrote: > I probably should have researched memory barriers a bit more. > I knew a little bit about them but wasn't sure if they were needed here. > The problem may also exist for the rest of the shared memory. For the purposes of running VMS, what really and ultimately matters is no

Re: [Simh] New simulator - VAX-11/782

2017-05-25 Thread Paul Koning
> On May 25, 2017, at 6:51 PM, Matt Burke wrote: > > On 25/05/2017 04:03, Sergey Oboguev wrote: >> Superficially looking at (AS)MP VMS code, it appears that the following >> should (hopefully) suffice for correct operation: >> >> 1. BBSSI and BBCCI should acquire a lock when accessing the memo

Re: [Simh] New simulator - VAX-11/782

2017-05-25 Thread Matt Burke
On 25/05/2017 04:03, Sergey Oboguev wrote: > Superficially looking at (AS)MP VMS code, it appears that the > following should (hopefully) suffice for correct operation: > > 1. BBSSI and BBCCI should acquire a lock when accessing the memory > location. A simplistic implementation may use one lock fo

Re: [Simh] VAX-11/782

2017-05-25 Thread Sergey Oboguev
Curiously enough, 11/782 and other MA780-based models were not the only multiprocessor design based on the 11/780. Some brave souls just took out the SBI terminator and hooked in a second KA780 CPU in its place, using the created dual-processor machine to develop what appears to be the very fir