Please disregard dead.letter detritus!
> > How do you feel about the dwelling value? The inspection came in at
> > $133,000 for the replacement cost of your home, do you agree? The policy is
> > currently at $205,000.
>
> How was the inspection estimate calculated:
> Was it based on current
> How do you feel about the dwelling value? The inspection came in at $133,000
> for the replacement cost of your home, do you agree? The policy is currently
> at $205,000.
How was the inspection estimate calculated:
Was it based on current condition or replacement cost?
> Reading the
On 9/6/17 11:26 AM, khandy21yo wrote:
> Is there any source for actual Whirlwind Code?
CHM has paper and magnetic tapes archived, but not read.
Code appears in various docments on bitsavers
___
Simh mailing list
Simh@trailing-edge.com
Wikipedia has some rather odd ideas sometimes.
Is there any source for actual Whirlwind Code? It might give more information
about how people actually used it.
Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A
Original message From: Paul Koning
Date: 9/6/17 8:19 AM
On 06-Sep-17 08:19, Paul Koning wrote:
>> On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:18 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
>>
>> It's a heavy lift & overkill, but GCC (gas) can be made to cross-compile
>> for/from any reasonable machine. That gives you a complete toolset - but
>> it's a lot of work.
> The
On 06-Sep-17 09:21, khandy21yo wrote:
> Reading the Wikipedia page about Whirlwind, it mentions that the pdp1
> is a direct descendent, so would a pdp1 assembler work? Or a tx0
> Assembler? I don't know if these already exist or not.
>
> Is the pdp1 a transistorized Whirlwind as the Wikipedia
Reading the Wikipedia page about Whirlwind, it mentions that the pdp1 is a
direct descendent, so would a pdp1 assembler work? Or a tx0 Assembler? I don't
know if these already exist or not.
Is the pdp1 a transistorized Whirlwind as the Wikipedia article suggests? We
already have an emulator for
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 9:18 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
>
> It's a heavy lift & overkill, but GCC (gas) can be made to cross-compile
> for/from any reasonable machine. That gives you a complete toolset - but
> it's a lot of work.
The assembler (gas) is separate from the compiler
This aligns with my thinking. There may be some variation from simulator
to simulator. Most are fairly conservative in what they do, system calls
will mostly be in the area of intersection between Windows and POSIX.
Some may just run, some more may run with a recompile, more with minor
Hi,
I have just made a simulator for Intel 8008 in SIMH. This is a "just for
fun" project that started when I found our old master thesis report from
1976 describing how we developed a computer using the Intel 8008 CPU.
I started to develop some code for 8008 based on the ALTAIR code. Later
I
The term for what he's after is a meta-assembler. I was looking at
these about 40 years ago!
Not much around these days, but look at:
http://metasm.cr0.org/
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:54:14 -0400
Bob Supnik wrote:
> Guy is looking to build a Whirlwind simulator, eventually.
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo